Brookings
·
Published
July 11, 2024
Share this article

Summary

  • Elaine Kamarck at Brookings argues that President Biden's poor debate performance against Trump has raised doubts about his ability to lead, prompting questions about the delegates' role in deciding nominations.
  • The article examines the history of delegate roles in U.S. party conventions, noting that although modern delegates are typically bound by primary results, under certain circumstances, they may exercise more independent decision-making.

Overview:  

This article was written by Elaine Kamarck at Brookings.

  • Delegates in modern conventions are often seen as symbolic, yet historical and current contexts reveal their potential power.
  • Rule changes and debates over delegate binding and conscience clauses have shaped presidential nominations.

Key Quotes:  

  • “Because the victor at most modern conventions has been a foregone conclusion, the notion of delegates as the final decision-makers in a long nomination process has been lost—but, under certain circumstances, perhaps this one, they may still have the final word.”
  • “Delegates elected to the national convention pledged to a presidential candidate shall in all good conscience reflect the sentiments of those who elected them.”

What They Discuss:  

  • Between 1831 and 1972, U.S. presidential candidates were nominated by conventions composed of elected officials and party leaders, with primaries playing a minimal, non-binding role.
  • The 1968 Democratic convention, amidst anti-Vietnam War protests, led to reforms that required delegates to reflect voter preferences and transitioned towards primaries.
  • The Democratic "robot rule" (Rule 11(H)) in 1980 mandated that delegates vote for the candidate they were elected to support. Senator Kennedy's challenge to this rule demonstrated the difficulties of altering delegate commitments.
  • In 2016, Republican delegates faced a similar "robot rule" (Rule 16) controversy, aiming to introduce a conscience clause to vote against Trump, which ultimately failed.
  • Currently, the Democratic rule (Rule 13(J)) requires delegates to act "in all good conscience," a clause open to interpretation, which might become crucial if doubts about President Biden grow.

What They Recommend:  

  • Recognize the potential for delegate roles to shift under unusual circumstances, reflecting broader party concerns.
  • Monitor the application and interpretation of the "in all good conscience" clause in future conventions, especially given potential challenges to candidacies.

  

Key Takeaways:  

  • Historical shifts have transformed the role of delegates from decision-makers to more symbolic participants.
  • Despite reforms aimed at binding delegates to voter preferences, rules allowing for delegate discretion under specific conditions remain significant.
  • Present circumstances, such as doubts about a candidate's viability, can amplify the importance of these rules and the role of delegates.

This is a brief overview of the article by Elaine Kamarck at Brookings. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Biden’s debate performance threatens his ability to win
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Biden’s debate performance threatens his ability to win

Summary
  • William A. Galston at Brookings assesses the impact of first presidential debates since 1976, noting their significant but delayed effect on voter preferences, often detracting from the incumbent or their party.
  • Recent debates show a 2.8 percentage point average voter shift, critical in tightly contested elections. Following the Biden-Trump debate, Biden's standing dropped 2 points, heightening the challenge of securing necessary electoral votes.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Why an Open Border Means More Expensive Housing
Heritage Foundation
·
Nov 18, 2023

Why an Open Border Means More Expensive Housing

Summary
  • EJ Antoni at Heritage Foundation argues that the influx of millions of illegal aliens into the United States over the last 3½ years has significantly increased housing demand, leading to skyrocketing home prices as basic economics dictate that increased demand raises prices.
  • The article asserts that while many blame the housing crisis on government overspending and interest rate manipulation, few recognize the role of open-border policies in escalating home prices, highlighting that curbing illegal immigration is necessary for housing market stabilization.
Conservative
Commentary
·
Immigration
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Shaping NATO’s Future: 5 Key Priorities for Washington to Build on After the 75th NATO Summit
Center for American Progress
·
Nov 18, 2023

Shaping NATO’s Future: 5 Key Priorities for Washington to Build on After the 75th NATO Summit

Summary
  • Robert Benson at Center for American Progress writes that the 75th NATO Summit underscored the urgency of paving a clear membership path for Ukraine and strengthening Eastern Europe's defenses against Russian aggression, marking vital steps for the alliance's future.
  • The column asserts that Washington must ensure all NATO members meet their defense spending commitments and enhance cybersecurity to tackle sophisticated threats, while also expanding NATO’s engagement in the Indo-Pacific region to counter China’s growing military assertiveness.
Progressive
Policy Analysis
·
U.S. Military & Defense
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Tracing the rise of Russian state media on TikTok
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Tracing the rise of Russian state media on TikTok

Summary
  • Brookings Foreign Policy Fellow Valerie Wirtschafter examines the growing influence of Russian state-affiliated accounts on TikTok and compares it with their presence on other social media platforms like Telegram and X (formerly Twitter).
  • Russian state-affiliated accounts are leveraging TikTok's reach to disseminate state-backed narratives.
  • Despite lower overall activity compared to other platforms, the engagement per post on TikTok is significantly higher.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
Ukraine-Russia War
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Assessing Israel’s Strike on Iran
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Assessing Israel’s Strike on Iran

Summary
  • Israel conducted a precision strike on an Iranian air defense system, signaling its capability and restraint to avoid broader conflict.
  • The attack was a response to an unprecedented direct missile and drone attack by Iran on Israeli soil, marking a significant escalation in their long-standing tensions.

Leans Right
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.