Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Published
May 3, 2024

Assessing Israel’s Strike on Iran

Leans Right
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Share this article

Summary

  • Israel conducted a precision strike on an Iranian air defense system, signaling its capability and restraint to avoid broader conflict.
  • The attack was a response to an unprecedented direct missile and drone attack by Iran on Israeli soil, marking a significant escalation in their long-standing tensions.

Overview:

This article was written by Alexander Palmer, Daniel Byman, Seth G. Jones, and Joseph S. Bermudez Jr., analyzing a recent military engagement between Israel and Iran.

  • Israel conducted a precision strike on an Iranian air defense system, signaling its capability and restraint to avoid broader conflict.
  • The attack was a response to an unprecedented direct missile and drone attack by Iran on Israeli soil, marking a significant escalation in their long-standing tensions.

Key Quotes:

  • "Israel walked a tightrope between escalating the conflict further and inaction, while also signaling to Tehran that it could conduct precision strikes against strategic locations."
  • "The strike minimized this fear by targeting only the shortest-range radar in Iran’s air defense complex, designed not to locate threats but to guide interceptor missiles to their target."

What They Discuss:

  • The Israeli strike on April 19 targeted an S-300 air defense system part in Isfahan, which is strategically important due to its proximity to Iran’s Natanz nuclear enrichment facility.
  • The strike was calibrated to deter further escalation by destroying only a single engagement radar, which was quickly replaced by Iran.
  • Iran's initial attack on April 13 involved over 300 missiles and drones, the first direct assault from Iranian soil against Israel.
  • The incident reflects ongoing tension and the potential for escalation, influenced by internal political pressures in both Israel and Iran.
  • Both nations showed restraint to avoid a full-scale war, although future provocations could disrupt this delicate balance.

What They Recommend:

  • Continued vigilance and preparedness for rapid escalation in response to geopolitical developments in the region.
  • Engagement in diplomatic efforts to mitigate the risks of further military confrontations.

Key Takeaways:

  • The incident underscores the fragile nature of regional stability and the potential for minor incidents to escalate into significant conflicts.
  • Israel’s strategy of measured military responses aims to maintain a balance between deterrence and outright war.
  • The political dynamics within both Israel and Iran play crucial roles in shaping their military engagements.

Disclaimer:

This is a brief overview of the work by Alexander Palmer, Daniel Byman, Seth G. Jones, and Joseph S. Bermudez Jr. from the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Bring Back Trump’s China Policy
Heritage Foundation
·
Nov 18, 2023

Bring Back Trump’s China Policy

Summary
  • Bryan Burack at Heritage Foundation writes that the Trump administration's significant foreign policy legacy was its strategic response to China's economic warfare against the U.S., emphasizing the importance of maintaining these measures for deterrence.
  • The article asserts that the Biden administration has adopted a less assertive approach, reviving engagement policies with China due to concerns that aggressive economic protections might provoke conflict, which has led to counterproductive security tradeoffs.
Conservative
Commentary
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Project 2025’s Tax Plan Would Raise Taxes on the Middle Class and Cut Taxes for the Wealthy
Center for American Progress
·
Nov 18, 2023

Project 2025’s Tax Plan Would Raise Taxes on the Middle Class and Cut Taxes for the Wealthy

Summary
  • Brendan Duke at Center for American Progress argues that Project 2025 proposes a tax plan that raises taxes on low- and middle-income families while giving significant tax cuts to the wealthy and corporations.
  • The analysis asserts that the introduction of a flat consumption tax and elimination of income taxes would result in higher costs for middle- and low-income households, shifting the tax burden away from wealthy individuals and large corporations.
Progressive
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Kamala Harris’s chances in November could hinge on a women’s voting surge
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Kamala Harris’s chances in November could hinge on a women’s voting surge

Summary
  • William H. Frey at Brookings argues that Vice President Kamala Harris's nomination as the Democratic presidential candidate has invigorated the race, with a particular impact on female voters who have historically supported Democratic candidates.

  • The analysis reviews that women's votes were crucial in recent elections, highlighting how post-Roe v. Wade changes and Harris’s advocacy on women's issues could lead to a significant voting surge, potentially favoring her in the 2024 election.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Why does building and maintaining highways in the US cost so much?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Why does building and maintaining highways in the US cost so much?

Summary
  • Comfort Oshagbemi and David Wessel at Brookings examine why the U.S. spends substantially more on transportation infrastructure compared to other countries, highlighting limited state DOT capacity and over-reliance on consultants as key cost-drivers.
  • The authors argue that limited competition and insufficient bidder outreach in the market for government construction contracts contribute to higher infrastructure costs in the U.S., and increasing bidder outreach and improving project planning can significantly reduce these costs.
Leans Left
Research
·
U.S. Economy
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump, Harris, and All the Wrong Ways to Do Tax Reform
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump, Harris, and All the Wrong Ways to Do Tax Reform

Summary
  • Adam N. Michel at Cato Institute argues that tax policy's prominence in the presidential campaign is due to the impending expiration of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and the candidates' proposals for new special-interest tax breaks that complicate and increase the tax code's complexity.
  • The report asserts that while there is bipartisan support for extending most of the expiring tax cuts, proposed targeted benefits for tips, families, homeowners, domestic production, and seniors will further complicate the tax system and pose significant fiscal challenges.
Libertarian
Policy Analysis
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.