Brookings
·
Published
July 5, 2024

Biden’s debate performance threatens his ability to win

Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Share this article

Summary

  • William A. Galston at Brookings assesses the impact of first presidential debates since 1976, noting their significant but delayed effect on voter preferences, often detracting from the incumbent or their party.
  • Recent debates show a 2.8 percentage point average voter shift, critical in tightly contested elections. Following the Biden-Trump debate, Biden's standing dropped 2 points, heightening the challenge of securing necessary electoral votes.

Overview:

This article was written by William A. Galston at Brookings.

  • The first presidential debate of 2024 has resulted in a noticeable shift in voter preferences, increasing former President Trump's lead by 2 percentage points.
  • President Biden faces compounded challenges from previous issues that have negatively impacted his public standing, which were intensified by his debate performance.

Key Quotes:

  • “Since 1976, the first debate of a presidential year has shifted voters’ preferences by an average of 2.4 percentage points during the two weeks following the debate, almost always against the incumbent president (or the incumbent’s party when the president is not running for reelection).”
  • “In the past three presidential elections, the first debate has moved voters’ preferences by an average of 2.8 percentage points. And because we are closely as well as deeply divided, with elections decided by small margins, changes of this size can be decisive.”

What They Discuss:

  • The 2 percentage point shift toward Trump is significant and has altered the dynamics between the candidates. Trump's lead grew from 1.5 points before the debate to 3.5 points afterward.
  • Due to larger margins in Blue states, Democrats require a substantial lead in the popular vote to win the Electoral College. Biden's 4.5-point margin in 2020 was barely enough to secure victory.
  • Post-debate, Biden's situation demands an improvement of at least 5 points in the popular vote to ensure an Electoral College win.
  • The debate exacerbated existing problems for Biden, including doubts about his age and leadership capabilities, high prices, and immigration issues.
  • Biden's inability to effectively defend his record has heightened concerns and has not stemmed the calls within his party for him to withdraw from the race.

What They Recommend:

  • The article does not directly provide policy recommendations but highlights the necessity for Biden to address his weaknesses and public doubts.
  • It implies an urgency for a strategic turnaround to regain voter confidence and secure his position in the race.

Key Takeaways:

  • The first debate has significantly impacted voter preferences, favoring Trump by enhancing his lead.
  • President Biden needs a considerable boost in the popular vote to win the Electoral College, compounded by existing public doubts and criticisms.
  • The debate has only intensified the challenges facing Biden, putting additional pressure on his campaign to find effective solutions swiftly.

This is a brief overview of the article by William A. Galston at Brookings. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
The Need for Supreme Court Term Limits
Center for American Progress
·
Nov 18, 2023

The Need for Supreme Court Term Limits

Summary
  • Maggie Jo Buchanan points out that the average tenure of Supreme Court justices has significantly increased, leading to a lack of regularity in vacancies and a more politically charged confirmation process.
  • Implementing an 18-year nonrenewable term limit for Supreme Court justices could help better reflect the broader public and reduce the politicization of the court.
Progressive
Report
·
U.S. Government & Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Israel-Hamas Conflict: 5 Actions Washington Should Prioritize Now
Center for American Progress
·
Nov 18, 2023

Israel-Hamas Conflict: 5 Actions Washington Should Prioritize Now

Summary
  • The U.S. should prioritize negotiating a humanitarian ceasefire in the Israel-Hamas conflict and ensure robust humanitarian aid to Gaza, while supporting Israel's defense needs without contributing to collective punishment against Palestinians.
  • It's important for the U.S. to enforce policies on civilian protection and human rights in the conflict, and to lead diplomatic efforts for a political solution that fosters lasting peace between Israelis and Palestinians.
Progressive
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Colleges’ Inexcusable Cowardice on Hamas
American Enterprise Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Colleges’ Inexcusable Cowardice on Hamas

Summary
  • AEI expert Samuel J. Abrams argues that the silence or delayed response of college administrations in the face of Hamas's attacks is a moral failure and indicative of a broader issue of anti-Semitism on campuses.
  • Abrams writes that colleges and universities should swiftly condemn actions taken by Hamas against innocent Israelis, and administrators and presidents who fail to confront these issues should step down.
Conservative
Blog
·
Education
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
What China’s Ban on Rare Earths Processing Technology Exports Means
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

What China’s Ban on Rare Earths Processing Technology Exports Means

Summary
  • China's decision to ban the export of rare minerals affects U.S. national, economic, and rare earth security, given that rare earth elements are crucial in defense and technology sectors.
  • The U.S. has and should expedite its efforts to address its vulnerability in this area through funding decisions to enhance domestic rare earth processing capabilities.
Leans Right
Commentary
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The Painful Lesson: Defense Is Not Enough
Hudson Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

The Painful Lesson: Defense Is Not Enough

Summary
  • Hudson scholar John P. Walters writes that the October 7 attacks in Israel by Hamas showcases the need for a more proactive approach to deterrence beyond passive defense strategies.
  • Walters criticizes U.S. policy towards Israel, suggesting it has encouraged a passive defense approach and hindered proactive deterrence.
Conservative
Report
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.