Brookings
·
Published
July 5, 2024

Biden’s debate performance threatens his ability to win

Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Share this article

Summary

  • William A. Galston at Brookings assesses the impact of first presidential debates since 1976, noting their significant but delayed effect on voter preferences, often detracting from the incumbent or their party.
  • Recent debates show a 2.8 percentage point average voter shift, critical in tightly contested elections. Following the Biden-Trump debate, Biden's standing dropped 2 points, heightening the challenge of securing necessary electoral votes.

Overview:

This article was written by William A. Galston at Brookings.

  • The first presidential debate of 2024 has resulted in a noticeable shift in voter preferences, increasing former President Trump's lead by 2 percentage points.
  • President Biden faces compounded challenges from previous issues that have negatively impacted his public standing, which were intensified by his debate performance.

Key Quotes:

  • “Since 1976, the first debate of a presidential year has shifted voters’ preferences by an average of 2.4 percentage points during the two weeks following the debate, almost always against the incumbent president (or the incumbent’s party when the president is not running for reelection).”
  • “In the past three presidential elections, the first debate has moved voters’ preferences by an average of 2.8 percentage points. And because we are closely as well as deeply divided, with elections decided by small margins, changes of this size can be decisive.”

What They Discuss:

  • The 2 percentage point shift toward Trump is significant and has altered the dynamics between the candidates. Trump's lead grew from 1.5 points before the debate to 3.5 points afterward.
  • Due to larger margins in Blue states, Democrats require a substantial lead in the popular vote to win the Electoral College. Biden's 4.5-point margin in 2020 was barely enough to secure victory.
  • Post-debate, Biden's situation demands an improvement of at least 5 points in the popular vote to ensure an Electoral College win.
  • The debate exacerbated existing problems for Biden, including doubts about his age and leadership capabilities, high prices, and immigration issues.
  • Biden's inability to effectively defend his record has heightened concerns and has not stemmed the calls within his party for him to withdraw from the race.

What They Recommend:

  • The article does not directly provide policy recommendations but highlights the necessity for Biden to address his weaknesses and public doubts.
  • It implies an urgency for a strategic turnaround to regain voter confidence and secure his position in the race.

Key Takeaways:

  • The first debate has significantly impacted voter preferences, favoring Trump by enhancing his lead.
  • President Biden needs a considerable boost in the popular vote to win the Electoral College, compounded by existing public doubts and criticisms.
  • The debate has only intensified the challenges facing Biden, putting additional pressure on his campaign to find effective solutions swiftly.

This is a brief overview of the article by William A. Galston at Brookings. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Rethinking Technology Transfer Policy toward China
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Rethinking Technology Transfer Policy toward China

Summary
  • Current methods like export controls are not enough to change China's practices on stolen technology, and the West needs to work together prevent this.
  • The article emphasizes a coordinated diplomatic effort to make China a responsible participant in global markets, focusing on reducing China's unfair trade behaviors and holding it accountable for its actions.
Centrist
Research
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Assessing Israel’s Strike on Iran
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Assessing Israel’s Strike on Iran

Summary
  • Israel conducted a precision strike on an Iranian air defense system, signaling its capability and restraint to avoid broader conflict.
  • The attack was a response to an unprecedented direct missile and drone attack by Iran on Israeli soil, marking a significant escalation in their long-standing tensions.

Centrist
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The Consequences of China’s New Rare Earths Export Restrictions
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

The Consequences of China’s New Rare Earths Export Restrictions

Summary

New export restrictions imposed by China on rare earth elements have significant implications for U.S. sourcing of these critical materials, particularly for defense technologies. The restrictions require licenses for exports, potentially disrupting supply chains and impacting U.S. firms, especially in the defense sector, per commentary from Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Centrist
Article
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
How Trump Sees Allies and Partners
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

How Trump Sees Allies and Partners

Summary

With Donald Trump's potential return to the White House, global partners must adapt to a shift toward an "America First" foreign policy. This approach prioritizes U.S. interests and presents a more unpredictable stance towards international relations, per commentary from Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Centrist
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Seeding Security: Why Agrobiodiversity Loss Threatens National Security
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Seeding Security: Why Agrobiodiversity Loss Threatens National Security

Summary

Agrobiodiversity loss poses significant risks to food security and may undermine political stability. Protecting diverse agricultural species is crucial for sustaining food production and responding to environmental challenges, per commentary from Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Centrist
Commentary
·
Climate Change
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.