Center for American Progress
·
Published
December 14, 2023

Emergency Arms Sale to Israel Undermines Accountability

Progressive
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Share this article

Summary

  • The emergency arms sale to Israel undermines effective oversight of arms transfers and contradicts the Biden administration’s policies on civilian protection and human rights.
  • Congress should preserve oversight over weapons transfers and consider amendments requiring reporting on compliance with U.S. and international law and protection of civilians.

Overview:

The article by Allison McManus, Laura Kilbury, and Robert Benson at the Center for American Progress critiques the U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken's decision to use emergency authority for the immediate sale of nearly 14,000 120-millimeter tank munition cartridges to Israel. This decision bypassed the standard 15-day period of congressional review and occurred amid concerns over Israel's failure to protect civilians in a military campaign that has claimed over 18,000 lives.

Key Points:

  1. The emergency arms sale to Israel undermines effective oversight of arms transfers and contradicts the Biden administration’s policies on civilian protection and human rights.
  2. Previous uses of emergency authority, such as for Ukraine in 2022 and for Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Jordan in 2019, were conducted under different circumstances and with varying degrees of support and controversy.

Relevant Policies and Concerns:

  • The U.S. Department of Defense's Civilian Harm Mitigation and Response Action Plan (CHMR-AP) and the U.S. State Department's Civilian Harm Incident Response Guidance aim to prevent U.S. complicity in civilian harm.
  • The Conventional Arms Transfer (CAT) policy requires considering the risk of human rights violations before approving arms transfers.
  • Israel's military offensive in Gaza has raised concerns about civilian harm, with reports suggesting that American-made weapons have been implicated in civilian casualties.​

Policy Recommendations:

  • The administration should adhere to its policies, reviewing arms transfers prior to approval and investigating any reported incidents involving U.S. weapons.
  • Congress should preserve oversight over weapons transfers and consider amendments requiring reporting on compliance with U.S. and international law and protection of civilians.​

Conclusion:

  • The high civilian death toll in Gaza warrants more scrutiny for arms transfers to Israel, and policymakers should ensure compliance with civilian harm mitigation policies.

This is a brief overview of the article from the Center for American Progress. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Bring Back Trump’s China Policy
Heritage Foundation
·
Nov 18, 2023

Bring Back Trump’s China Policy

Summary
  • Bryan Burack at Heritage Foundation writes that the Trump administration's significant foreign policy legacy was its strategic response to China's economic warfare against the U.S., emphasizing the importance of maintaining these measures for deterrence.
  • The article asserts that the Biden administration has adopted a less assertive approach, reviving engagement policies with China due to concerns that aggressive economic protections might provoke conflict, which has led to counterproductive security tradeoffs.
Conservative
Commentary
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Project 2025’s Tax Plan Would Raise Taxes on the Middle Class and Cut Taxes for the Wealthy
Center for American Progress
·
Nov 18, 2023

Project 2025’s Tax Plan Would Raise Taxes on the Middle Class and Cut Taxes for the Wealthy

Summary
  • Brendan Duke at Center for American Progress argues that Project 2025 proposes a tax plan that raises taxes on low- and middle-income families while giving significant tax cuts to the wealthy and corporations.
  • The analysis asserts that the introduction of a flat consumption tax and elimination of income taxes would result in higher costs for middle- and low-income households, shifting the tax burden away from wealthy individuals and large corporations.
Progressive
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Kamala Harris’s chances in November could hinge on a women’s voting surge
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Kamala Harris’s chances in November could hinge on a women’s voting surge

Summary
  • William H. Frey at Brookings argues that Vice President Kamala Harris's nomination as the Democratic presidential candidate has invigorated the race, with a particular impact on female voters who have historically supported Democratic candidates.

  • The analysis reviews that women's votes were crucial in recent elections, highlighting how post-Roe v. Wade changes and Harris’s advocacy on women's issues could lead to a significant voting surge, potentially favoring her in the 2024 election.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Why does building and maintaining highways in the US cost so much?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Why does building and maintaining highways in the US cost so much?

Summary
  • Comfort Oshagbemi and David Wessel at Brookings examine why the U.S. spends substantially more on transportation infrastructure compared to other countries, highlighting limited state DOT capacity and over-reliance on consultants as key cost-drivers.
  • The authors argue that limited competition and insufficient bidder outreach in the market for government construction contracts contribute to higher infrastructure costs in the U.S., and increasing bidder outreach and improving project planning can significantly reduce these costs.
Leans Left
Research
·
U.S. Economy
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump, Harris, and All the Wrong Ways to Do Tax Reform
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump, Harris, and All the Wrong Ways to Do Tax Reform

Summary
  • Adam N. Michel at Cato Institute argues that tax policy's prominence in the presidential campaign is due to the impending expiration of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and the candidates' proposals for new special-interest tax breaks that complicate and increase the tax code's complexity.
  • The report asserts that while there is bipartisan support for extending most of the expiring tax cuts, proposed targeted benefits for tips, families, homeowners, domestic production, and seniors will further complicate the tax system and pose significant fiscal challenges.
Libertarian
Policy Analysis
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.