Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
·
Published
June 17, 2024

How AI Might Affect Decisionmaking in a National Security Crisis

Liberal
Policy Analysis
·
Artificial Intelligence
Share this article

Summary

  • Christopher S. Chivvis and Jennifer Kavanagh at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace discuss the potential for AI to both enhance and complicate decision-making within the U.S. National Security Council, highlighting challenges like information overload and misperceptions.
  • The article asserts that advanced AI could combat groupthink by offering diverse perspectives but also risks intensifying it due to overconfidence in AI systems, and emphasizes the need for training and AI governance to ensure effective use and stability in crises.

Overview:  

This article was written by Christopher S. Chivvis and Jennifer Kavanagh at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

  • AI systems can both accelerate and complicate decision-making in national security scenarios.
  • Overconfidence in AI recommendations could lead to groupthink and potentially dangerous misperceptions.

Key Quotes:  

  • "AI-enabled systems can help accelerate the speed of commanders’ decisions and improve the quality and accuracy of those decisions."
  • "In reality, AI systems are only as good as the data they are trained on, and even the best AI have biases, make errors, and malfunction in unexpected ways."

What They Discuss:

  • The proliferation of AI in national security could slow decision-making because AI systems produce additional data that need to be evaluated.
  • AI’s potential to create uncertainty in crisis situations involves deepfake videos and potentially misleading information.
  • AI might challenge existing groupthink in decision-making settings by offering out-of-the-box ideas but could also entrench it if decision-makers over-rely on AI recommendations.
  • The development of AI tools by well-funded agencies could disturb the balance of influence among key governmental bodies like the Department of Defense and Intelligence Community.
  • Misjudging adversary actions influenced by AI systems could escalate crises due to the risk of miscalculation.

What They Recommend:

  • Implement thorough training for policymakers on AI systems to understand their limits and capabilities.
  • Establish an AI governance regime similar to arms control to manage and reduce risks of AI deployment in military contexts.
  • Foster international cooperation, especially between the U.S. and China, on AI safety and governance measures.

Key Takeaways:

  • AI has the dual potential to both streamline and complicate crisis decision-making processes.
  • Training and prior experience with AI tools are crucial for their effective and safe use.
  • Establishing clear norms and agreements on AI use is important for reducing the risk of misperceptions and unintended escalations.
  • Policymakers must be wary of AI’s potential to sway groupthink and maintain a balanced approach incorporating human judgement.

This is a brief overview of the article by Christopher S. Chivvis and Jennifer Kavanagh at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Why Is It So Hard for China to Boost Domestic Demand?
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
·
Nov 18, 2023

Why Is It So Hard for China to Boost Domestic Demand?

Summary
  • Experts at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace argue that China's Third Plenum communiqué remains vague on demand-side measures, even though boosting consumption is widely seen as crucial for sustainable growth.

  • The analysis suggests that despite consensus on the need for stronger consumer demand, Beijing faces challenges in shifting from an investment-driven economy due to long-standing transfers that benefit manufacturing, infrastructure, and local governments at the expense of households.
Liberal
Commentary
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
A Cosmopolitan Case against World Government
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

A Cosmopolitan Case against World Government

Summary
  • Ilya Somin at Cato Institute argues that supporting globalization and opposing world government are not contradictory positions because a world government could worsen voter ignorance, hinder foot voting, and potentially spiral into catastrophic authoritarianism.
  • The article asserts that world government is unnecessary for solving global issues and could suppress beneficial diversity and competition between nations. Instead, voluntary cooperation among major powers can address international challenges effectively.
Libertarian
Report
·
U.S. Government & Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Project 2025 Compels Local Prosecutors To Enforce Extreme Right-Wing Laws
Center for American Progress
·
Nov 18, 2023

Project 2025 Compels Local Prosecutors To Enforce Extreme Right-Wing Laws

Summary
  • Lindsey McLendon at Center for American Progress argues that Project 2025 aims to dismantle the U.S. system of checks and balances, granting politicians, judges, and corporations increased control over Americans' lives by enforcing extreme right-wing policies through the U.S. Department of Justice.
  • The Center for American Progress asserts that Project 2025 would pressure local district attorneys to enforce severe abortion bans and other restrictive laws, exacerbating the maternal health crisis and reducing access to essential reproductive healthcare, particularly in states with already high maternal mortality rates.
Progressive
Article
·
U.S. Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump chose Vance to reinforce his message
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump chose Vance to reinforce his message

Summary
  • Elaine Kamarck at Brookings writes that in selecting Senator J.D. Vance as his running mate, Donald Trump aimed to solidify his hard-right agenda, emphasizing Vance's alignment with Trump's core messages and MAGA base.
  • The article examines how Trump's choice of Vance follows the "reinforcing model" of vice-presidential selection, where the VP candidate strengthens the presidential candidate's message and governance, rather than providing a traditional ideological or geographic balance.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Putting Public Colleges on a Path to Privatization
American Enterprise Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Putting Public Colleges on a Path to Privatization

Summary
  • Adam Kissel at American Enterprise Institute argues that public universities suffer from a culture of timidity in discussing conservative ideas and that privatizing these institutions could introduce market discipline, potentially saving states billions in subsidies.
  • The article advocates for states to wait until interest rates drop below 4 percent before attempting to privatize universities through an endowment/bond plan, suggesting this transition will lead to institutions better aligned with market needs and free from bureaucratic constraints.
Conservative
Commentary
·
Education
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.