Brookings
·
Published
September 4, 2024
Share this article

Summary

  • Experts at Brookings argue that Kamala Harris has regained lost ground for the Democrats, erasing the "enthusiasm gap" and leading in both national and key swing state polls against Donald Trump.
  • They examine the reliability of poll averages, highlighting historical underestimation of Trump’s support and the necessity for Harris to maintain significant momentum to secure victory.

Overview:

This article was written by William A. Galston at Brookings.

  • Kamala Harris has gained substantial ground since replacing Joe Biden as the Democratic nominee, closing the enthusiasm gap and outperforming Trump on key personal attributes.
  • Although Harris currently leads in many critical states, the election remains highly volatile, with polling inaccuracies and unpredictable events potentially influencing the final outcome.

Key Quotes:

  • "In six extraordinary weeks since replacing Joe Biden as the Democratic presidential nominee, Kamala Harris has regained all the ground Biden lost between January and July—and more."
  • "We should also be cautious about concluding that Harris now enjoys a clear lead over Trump. In recent elections, not just individual polls but also poll averages have turned out to be misleading."

What They Discuss:

  • Averages of multiple polls are more reliable than individual polls, with RealClearPolitics and FiveThirtyEight offering different methodologies.
  • Harris's lead in crucial "Blue Wall" states could provide her with the 270 electoral votes needed, but this is not guaranteed.
  • Historical inaccuracy of polls, especially in estimating Trump's support, underscores the need for caution.
  • Polling errors have been more pronounced in key swing states compared to other regions.
  • Issues such as inflation may play a more significant role in voter preferences this election cycle, over issues like abortion.

What They Recommend:

  • Be cautious about relying solely on current poll data, as past inaccuracies have shown.
  • Consider multiple sources and types of polling data to get a more comprehensive view of the race.
  • Stay alert for shifts in campaign dynamics, especially after significant events like debates.

Key Takeaways:

  • Harris's early surge in support does not necessarily secure her victory due to the fluid nature of electoral politics.
  • Polling errors, particularly underestimating Trump’s support, have been significant in past elections.
  • Key issues and voter demographics today may not align perfectly with past election cycles.
  • Election outcomes likely depend on a small number of votes in crucial swing states, making the race highly competitive and unpredictable.

This is a brief overview of the article by William A. Galston at Brookings. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
LA fires show the growing security threat of climate change
Peterson Institute for International Economics
·
Nov 18, 2023

LA fires show the growing security threat of climate change

Summary

The fires in Los Angeles highlight the urgent security threat posed by climate change, which is reshaping national security paradigms. This disconnect limits the government's response to climate disasters, putting public trust and political stability at risk, per commentary from Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Center
Research
·
Climate Change
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Journalism needs better representation to counter AI
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Journalism needs better representation to counter AI

Summary

Journalism is currently facing significant challenges related to staff layoffs and the rise of artificial intelligence. As automation increases, the representation of diverse voices is at risk, impacting the quality and integrity of reporting, per commentary from Brookings.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
Artificial Intelligence
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
What Do U.S. Allies Really Contribute to the Costs of Global Security?
RAND Corporation
·
Nov 18, 2023

What Do U.S. Allies Really Contribute to the Costs of Global Security?

Summary

U.S. allies contribute more to global security than often perceived. Current NATO spending targets do not fully capture each country's capabilities and contributions, which differ widely, per commentary from RAND Corporation.

Center
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
AEI would print money for the Pentagon if it could
Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft
·
Nov 18, 2023

AEI would print money for the Pentagon if it could

Summary

A new commentary from the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft critiques the American Enterprise Institute's call for substantial increases to Pentagon spending, arguing it ignores the detrimental outcomes of past military interventions. The report asserts that a military-first strategy has consistently failed to achieve its objectives and has created further instability.

Bipartisan
Policy Analysis
·
U.S. Military & Defense
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump's threatened tariffs projected to damage economies of US, Canada, Mexico, and China
Peterson Institute for International Economics
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump's threatened tariffs projected to damage economies of US, Canada, Mexico, and China

Summary

Trump's threatened tariffs could lead to significant economic harm for the U.S., Canada, Mexico, and China. These tariffs, if implemented, threaten to slow economic growth and increase inflation across all involved nations, per commentary from Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Center
Commentary
·
Global Economy
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.