Summary

  • Brendan Duke at Center for American Progress argues that Project 2025 proposes a tax plan that raises taxes on low- and middle-income families while giving significant tax cuts to the wealthy and corporations.
  • The analysis asserts that the introduction of a flat consumption tax and elimination of income taxes would result in higher costs for middle- and low-income households, shifting the tax burden away from wealthy individuals and large corporations.

Overview:  

This article was written by Brendan Duke at Center for American Progress.  

  • The article discusses how Project 2025's tax reform plans would significantly raise taxes on low- and middle-income households while providing substantial tax cuts for the wealthy.
  • The proposed tax changes would shift the burden from wealthy individuals and corporations to the middle class and poorer Americans, exacerbating income inequality.

Key Quotes:

  1. "This is because the two current bottom brackets (10 percent and 12 percent) are lower than the 15 percent tax bracket proposed by Project 2025."
  2. "The required roughly 45 percent VAT is a lower bound..."

What They Discuss:

  • The "intermediate tax reform" proposed by Project 2025 includes consolidating existing tax brackets to two brackets (15 percent and 30 percent), which would result in a $3,000 tax increase for the median family of four and a $950 increase for a typical single-person household.
  • The wealthiest 45,000 U.S. households would receive an average tax cut of $1.5–2.4 million due to the plan's restructuring and cuts to taxes on investment income.
  • Project 2025 aims to reduce the corporate tax rate from 21 percent to 18 percent, resulting in a $24 billion tax cut for America’s top 100 corporations.
  • The long-term plan includes replacing all individual and corporate income taxes with a consumption tax, potentially leading to a 45 percent national sales tax, which would cause a significant rise in prices and inflation.
  • The proposed tax changes would disproportionately impact middle-income households, increasing their average tax burden by $5,900, while the top 0.1 percent would see an average tax cut of $2 million.

What They Recommend:

  • Brendan Duke recommends a thorough evaluation of Project 2025 to understand its potential impacts on different income groups.
  • Policymakers should consider the regressive nature of shifting to a consumption tax and its long-term effects on economic inequality.
  • It’s implied that more progressive tax reforms, which include protections and deductions for low- and middle-income families, should be explored instead.

Key Takeaways:

  • Project 2025’s tax reform plans would lead to significant tax increases for middle-income households and substantial tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans and corporations.
  • The proposed consumption tax, replacing current income taxes, could result in steep price increases and inflation, disproportionately affecting low- and middle-income families.
  • These tax reforms could exacerbate economic inequality in the U.S. by shifting the tax burden from the rich to the poorer segments of society.

This is a brief overview of the article by Brendan Duke at Center for American Progress. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Bring Back Trump’s China Policy
Heritage Foundation
·
Nov 18, 2023

Bring Back Trump’s China Policy

Summary
  • Bryan Burack at Heritage Foundation writes that the Trump administration's significant foreign policy legacy was its strategic response to China's economic warfare against the U.S., emphasizing the importance of maintaining these measures for deterrence.
  • The article asserts that the Biden administration has adopted a less assertive approach, reviving engagement policies with China due to concerns that aggressive economic protections might provoke conflict, which has led to counterproductive security tradeoffs.
Conservative
Commentary
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Kamala Harris’s chances in November could hinge on a women’s voting surge
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Kamala Harris’s chances in November could hinge on a women’s voting surge

Summary
  • William H. Frey at Brookings argues that Vice President Kamala Harris's nomination as the Democratic presidential candidate has invigorated the race, with a particular impact on female voters who have historically supported Democratic candidates.

  • The analysis reviews that women's votes were crucial in recent elections, highlighting how post-Roe v. Wade changes and Harris’s advocacy on women's issues could lead to a significant voting surge, potentially favoring her in the 2024 election.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Why does building and maintaining highways in the US cost so much?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Why does building and maintaining highways in the US cost so much?

Summary
  • Comfort Oshagbemi and David Wessel at Brookings examine why the U.S. spends substantially more on transportation infrastructure compared to other countries, highlighting limited state DOT capacity and over-reliance on consultants as key cost-drivers.
  • The authors argue that limited competition and insufficient bidder outreach in the market for government construction contracts contribute to higher infrastructure costs in the U.S., and increasing bidder outreach and improving project planning can significantly reduce these costs.
Leans Left
Research
·
U.S. Economy
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump, Harris, and All the Wrong Ways to Do Tax Reform
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump, Harris, and All the Wrong Ways to Do Tax Reform

Summary
  • Adam N. Michel at Cato Institute argues that tax policy's prominence in the presidential campaign is due to the impending expiration of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and the candidates' proposals for new special-interest tax breaks that complicate and increase the tax code's complexity.
  • The report asserts that while there is bipartisan support for extending most of the expiring tax cuts, proposed targeted benefits for tips, families, homeowners, domestic production, and seniors will further complicate the tax system and pose significant fiscal challenges.
Libertarian
Policy Analysis
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Breaking Down the Biden Administration’s National Rent Stabilization Proposal
Urban Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Breaking Down the Biden Administration’s National Rent Stabilization Proposal

Summary
  • Urban Institute experts write that the Biden administration's rent stabilization proposal aims to cap annual rent increases at 5% for units owned by large landlords, conditioned on maintaining existing tax breaks, aiming to stabilize housing and protect tenants from eviction or displacement.
  • The experts argue that while the proposal could make more units affordable for low-income residents, it may also reduce the overall supply of rental units as landlords might convert properties or avoid entering the market, potentially driving up rents for uncontrolled units.
Liberal
Policy Analysis
·
U.S. Economy
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.