Summary

  • Brendan Duke at Center for American Progress argues that Project 2025 proposes a tax plan that raises taxes on low- and middle-income families while giving significant tax cuts to the wealthy and corporations.
  • The analysis asserts that the introduction of a flat consumption tax and elimination of income taxes would result in higher costs for middle- and low-income households, shifting the tax burden away from wealthy individuals and large corporations.

Overview:  

This article was written by Brendan Duke at Center for American Progress.  

  • The article discusses how Project 2025's tax reform plans would significantly raise taxes on low- and middle-income households while providing substantial tax cuts for the wealthy.
  • The proposed tax changes would shift the burden from wealthy individuals and corporations to the middle class and poorer Americans, exacerbating income inequality.

Key Quotes:

  1. "This is because the two current bottom brackets (10 percent and 12 percent) are lower than the 15 percent tax bracket proposed by Project 2025."
  2. "The required roughly 45 percent VAT is a lower bound..."

What They Discuss:

  • The "intermediate tax reform" proposed by Project 2025 includes consolidating existing tax brackets to two brackets (15 percent and 30 percent), which would result in a $3,000 tax increase for the median family of four and a $950 increase for a typical single-person household.
  • The wealthiest 45,000 U.S. households would receive an average tax cut of $1.5–2.4 million due to the plan's restructuring and cuts to taxes on investment income.
  • Project 2025 aims to reduce the corporate tax rate from 21 percent to 18 percent, resulting in a $24 billion tax cut for America’s top 100 corporations.
  • The long-term plan includes replacing all individual and corporate income taxes with a consumption tax, potentially leading to a 45 percent national sales tax, which would cause a significant rise in prices and inflation.
  • The proposed tax changes would disproportionately impact middle-income households, increasing their average tax burden by $5,900, while the top 0.1 percent would see an average tax cut of $2 million.

What They Recommend:

  • Brendan Duke recommends a thorough evaluation of Project 2025 to understand its potential impacts on different income groups.
  • Policymakers should consider the regressive nature of shifting to a consumption tax and its long-term effects on economic inequality.
  • It’s implied that more progressive tax reforms, which include protections and deductions for low- and middle-income families, should be explored instead.

Key Takeaways:

  • Project 2025’s tax reform plans would lead to significant tax increases for middle-income households and substantial tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans and corporations.
  • The proposed consumption tax, replacing current income taxes, could result in steep price increases and inflation, disproportionately affecting low- and middle-income families.
  • These tax reforms could exacerbate economic inequality in the U.S. by shifting the tax burden from the rich to the poorer segments of society.

This is a brief overview of the article by Brendan Duke at Center for American Progress. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
With AI, we need both competition and safety
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

With AI, we need both competition and safety

Summary
  • Tom Wheeler and Blair Levin at Brookings argue that the FTC and DOJ should investigate AI collaborations and transactions for antitrust concerns while simultaneously encouraging AI safety standards through industry cooperation.
  • They propose a model that balances competition and AI safety, advocating supervised processes, market incentives, and regulatory oversight to ensure AI companies collaborate on safety without undermining competitive markets.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
Artificial Intelligence
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
North Carolina’s emergence as a swing state could help Biden win in November
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

North Carolina’s emergence as a swing state could help Biden win in November

Summary
  • Elaine Kamarck and Deirdre Keenan at Brookings argue that North Carolina has become a key swing state due to significant population growth and shifting demographics, particularly in the Raleigh-Durham-Cary area, which is attracting college-educated professionals and new residents from heavily Democratic states, indicating a potential Democratic advantage in upcoming elections.
  • The analysis asserts that efforts by the North Carolina Democratic Party, led by Anderson Clayton, to mobilize young voters, re-engage rural communities, and contest every legislative race could generate significant momentum and potentially tilt the state toward a Democratic victory in the 2024 presidential election.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Russia Is a Strategic Spoiler in the Indo-Pacific
RAND Corporation
·
Nov 18, 2023

Russia Is a Strategic Spoiler in the Indo-Pacific

Summary
  • Derek Grossman at RAND Corporation writes that Russia continues to play a significant role in the Indo-Pacific, forging strategic partnerships with China, North Korea, and Vietnam to counter U.S. influence and distract from its invasion of Ukraine.
  • The article asserts that while Russia's influence lags behind China and the U.S., it remains capable of promoting anti-Western interests and destabilizing the regional order, drawing nations toward nonalignment rather than a Cold War–style bloc standoff.
Center
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump v. US: With Great Power Comes Great Immunity
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump v. US: With Great Power Comes Great Immunity

Summary
  • Gene Healy at Cato Institute argues that Chief Justice John Roberts' ruling in Trump v. United States introduces broad presidential immunities, raising concerns about unchecked executive power and "legislating from the bench."
  • The article asserts that these new immunities could pave the way for presidential recklessness, with critics like Healy and Justice Sonia Sotomayor highlighting the lack of constitutional basis and potential abuse of power by future presidents.
Libertarian
Commentary
·
U.S. Government & Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Biden’s debate performance threatens his ability to win
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Biden’s debate performance threatens his ability to win

Summary
  • William A. Galston at Brookings assesses the impact of first presidential debates since 1976, noting their significant but delayed effect on voter preferences, often detracting from the incumbent or their party.
  • Recent debates show a 2.8 percentage point average voter shift, critical in tightly contested elections. Following the Biden-Trump debate, Biden's standing dropped 2 points, heightening the challenge of securing necessary electoral votes.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.