RAND Corporation
·
Published
July 11, 2024

Russia Is a Strategic Spoiler in the Indo-Pacific

Center
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Share this article

Summary

  • Derek Grossman at RAND Corporation writes that Russia continues to play a significant role in the Indo-Pacific, forging strategic partnerships with China, North Korea, and Vietnam to counter U.S. influence and distract from its invasion of Ukraine.
  • The article asserts that while Russia's influence lags behind China and the U.S., it remains capable of promoting anti-Western interests and destabilizing the regional order, drawing nations toward nonalignment rather than a Cold War–style bloc standoff.

Overview:

This article was written by Derek Grossman at RAND Corporation, highlighting two key insights:

  • Russia continues to solidify its presence and strategic partnerships in the Indo-Pacific, countering U.S. influence and leveraging relationships with China and North Korea.
  • Despite Russia's active engagement, its influence in the Indo-Pacific is still considerably less significant than that of China and the United States.

Key Quotes:

  • "Although the Kremlin seems to desire a Cold War II–style bloc standoff between the West and East, it is unlikely to succeed in the Indo-Pacific region."
  • "While Russia's sway is not at the level of China's or the United States', it is certainly enough to promote its anti-Western interests and disrupt the already precarious regional order."

What They Discuss:

  • Between May and June, Russian President Vladimir Putin visited China, North Korea, and Vietnam to reinforce strategic alliances, also meeting with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
  • Half of Southeast Asia, much of South Asia, and nearly all Pacific Island countries abstained from participating in the Ukraine peace summit in Switzerland, underscoring Russia's influence.
  • While Russia lacks substantial economic offerings beyond arms and oil to Indo-Pacific nations, it strives to counter U.S. "hegemony" and distract from its actions in Ukraine.
  • Russia and North Korea renewed a 1961 defense pact, potentially heightening tensions with South Korea and affecting Seoul's stance on military aid to Ukraine.
  • North Korea has sent over 11,000 containers of munitions to Moscow since a September 2023 meeting, stemming from an agreement for mutual military aid and technical support.

What They Recommend:

  • The United States should avoid overreacting to the Russia–North Korea defense pact, recognizing that Russian military intervention in the Indo-Pacific is improbable while its focus remains on Ukraine.
  • Washington should focus on building its Indo-Pacific strategy without being distracted by Moscow's attempts to sow discord.

Key Takeaways:

  • Russia aims to establish strong strategic relationships in the Indo-Pacific as a counterbalance to U.S. influence, particularly aligning with China and North Korea.
  • Indo-Pacific nations are largely pursuing nonalignment strategies rather than forming rigid alliances with Moscow or Beijing.
  • The Kremlin's current influence is enough to disrupt regional dynamics and foster anti-Western sentiment, but it does not yet parallel the strategic weight of China or the U.S.
  • A cautious and measured U.S. response is advisable, maintaining focus on broader Indo-Pacific strategies without becoming overly concerned with Russia's maneuvers.

This is a brief overview of the article by Derek Grossman at RAND Corporation. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Rethinking Technology Transfer Policy toward China
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Rethinking Technology Transfer Policy toward China

Summary
  • Current methods like export controls are not enough to change China's practices on stolen technology, and the West needs to work together prevent this.
  • The article emphasizes a coordinated diplomatic effort to make China a responsible participant in global markets, focusing on reducing China's unfair trade behaviors and holding it accountable for its actions.
Centrist
Research
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Assessing Israel’s Strike on Iran
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Assessing Israel’s Strike on Iran

Summary
  • Israel conducted a precision strike on an Iranian air defense system, signaling its capability and restraint to avoid broader conflict.
  • The attack was a response to an unprecedented direct missile and drone attack by Iran on Israeli soil, marking a significant escalation in their long-standing tensions.

Centrist
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The Consequences of China’s New Rare Earths Export Restrictions
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

The Consequences of China’s New Rare Earths Export Restrictions

Summary

New export restrictions imposed by China on rare earth elements have significant implications for U.S. sourcing of these critical materials, particularly for defense technologies. The restrictions require licenses for exports, potentially disrupting supply chains and impacting U.S. firms, especially in the defense sector, per commentary from Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Centrist
Article
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
How Trump Sees Allies and Partners
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

How Trump Sees Allies and Partners

Summary

With Donald Trump's potential return to the White House, global partners must adapt to a shift toward an "America First" foreign policy. This approach prioritizes U.S. interests and presents a more unpredictable stance towards international relations, per commentary from Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Centrist
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Seeding Security: Why Agrobiodiversity Loss Threatens National Security
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Seeding Security: Why Agrobiodiversity Loss Threatens National Security

Summary

Agrobiodiversity loss poses significant risks to food security and may undermine political stability. Protecting diverse agricultural species is crucial for sustaining food production and responding to environmental challenges, per commentary from Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Centrist
Commentary
·
Climate Change
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.