American Enterprise Institute
·
Published
October 11, 2023
Share this article

Summary

  • Samuel J. Abrams at the American Enterprise Institute discusses the issue of free speech on college campuses, arguing the real issue lies with college administrators and diversity, equity, and inclusion offices, which contribute to a culture of censorship and fear.
  • Abrams argues students widely support the First Amendment and open debate, even if some ideas may be uncomfortable.

Overview:

This article by Samuel J. Abrams at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) discusses the issue of free speech on college campuses, arguing that students are not the primary problem when it comes to restrictions on speech.

  • Abrams emphasizes that the real issue lies with college administrators and diversity, equity, and inclusion offices, which contribute to a culture of censorship and fear.
  • The article highlights that most students value free speech and are open to diverse viewpoints.​

Key Quotes:

  1. "It is the college administrators and diversity, equity, and inclusion offices that hinder the classical liberal education experience."
  2. "About 61 percent of students often feel intimidated to share their ideas, opinions, or beliefs in class because they are different than those of their professors."​

What They Discuss:

  • The decline of viewpoint diversity and open debate in colleges, leading to ideological monoculture.
  • The misconception that student mobs are the main cause of speech limitations, while the role of college administrators is more significant.
  • Data from the Buckley Institute showing that a majority of students value free speech but feel pressured to self-censor.
  • The support among students for the First Amendment and open debate, even if some ideas may be uncomfortable.
  • The need to educate students on the value of free speech and diverse opinions for a better education and future leadership.

What They Recommend:

  • Supporting students' desire to learn and question, rather than focusing on a minority that seeks to limit liberal education.
  • Promoting the fact that most students understand the importance of listening to different opinions for a liberal education.
  • Encouraging students to be key players in pushing back against the impulse to silence debate.
  • Backing students in their learning and not blaming them for the problems of expression on campus.​

Key Takeaways:

  • The article challenges the narrative that students are the main impediment to free speech on campuses.
  • It highlights the need to address the role of college administrators in creating a restrictive environment.
  • The article underscores the importance of fostering an educational culture that values open debate and diverse viewpoints.

This is a brief overview of Samuel J. Abrams' article from the American Enterprise Institute. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Breaking Down the Biden Administration’s National Rent Stabilization Proposal
Urban Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Breaking Down the Biden Administration’s National Rent Stabilization Proposal

Summary
  • Urban Institute experts write that the Biden administration's rent stabilization proposal aims to cap annual rent increases at 5% for units owned by large landlords, conditioned on maintaining existing tax breaks, aiming to stabilize housing and protect tenants from eviction or displacement.
  • The experts argue that while the proposal could make more units affordable for low-income residents, it may also reduce the overall supply of rental units as landlords might convert properties or avoid entering the market, potentially driving up rents for uncontrolled units.
Liberal
Policy Analysis
·
U.S. Economy
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
How AI Might Affect Decisionmaking in a National Security Crisis
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
·
Nov 18, 2023

How AI Might Affect Decisionmaking in a National Security Crisis

Summary
  • Christopher S. Chivvis and Jennifer Kavanagh at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace discuss the potential for AI to both enhance and complicate decision-making within the U.S. National Security Council, highlighting challenges like information overload and misperceptions.
  • The article asserts that advanced AI could combat groupthink by offering diverse perspectives but also risks intensifying it due to overconfidence in AI systems, and emphasizes the need for training and AI governance to ensure effective use and stability in crises.
Liberal
Policy Analysis
·
Artificial Intelligence
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Is Kamala Harris leading Donald Trump in the presidential race?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Is Kamala Harris leading Donald Trump in the presidential race?

Summary
  • Experts at Brookings argue that Kamala Harris has regained lost ground for the Democrats, erasing the "enthusiasm gap" and leading in both national and key swing state polls against Donald Trump.
  • They examine the reliability of poll averages, highlighting historical underestimation of Trump’s support and the necessity for Harris to maintain significant momentum to secure victory.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump misses a golden opportunity in his acceptance speech
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump misses a golden opportunity in his acceptance speech

Summary
  • Elaine Kamarck and William A. Galston at Brookings examine that the Republican National Convention highlighted a stark contrast between a verbose Trump and a struggling Biden, leading to widespread speculation about Biden's potential exit and Kamala Harris's possible rise as the Democratic candidate.
  • The article argues that while Trump missed an opportunity to solidify his lead with a long-winded, undisciplined speech, Democratic officials and voters are increasingly viewing Biden as a weakened candidate, potentially paving the way for Harris to step in and challenge Trump's controversial policies.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Why is Kamala Harris wrapping up the Democratic nomination so quickly?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Why is Kamala Harris wrapping up the Democratic nomination so quickly?

Summary
  • Elaine Kamarck at Brookings writes that Joe Biden's endorsement of Kamala Harris for the Democratic Party's nomination is due to her extensive presidential-level vetting, practical time constraints, and her robust political experience.

  • The article asserts that Harris' widespread delegate support, substantial financial backing, and the urgent need for party unity and focus on the general election are key reasons for the swift consolidation around her candidacy.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.