Cato Institute
·
Published
December 28, 2023

Trump’s Disqualification: A Primer

Libertarian
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Share this article

Summary

  • Cato Institute expert Robert A. Levy writes that U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts will be "concerned about political repercussions" if Trump is disqualified from running.
  • Levy also argues that liberal justices will likely lean toward allowing voting citizens to decide if Trump should be President.

Overview:

  • This article was written by Robert A. Levy, discussing the complex issue of Donald Trump's potential disqualification from running for president in 2024.
  • The author critically examines the legal and constitutional implications surrounding the disqualification debate, focusing on the interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment and its application.

Key Quotes:

  • "No person shall … hold any office … who, having previously [served] … as an officer of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection."
  • "The US Constitution is not a legal code; it’s a set of broad principles that implement a framework for governance."​

What They Discuss:

  • Levy analyzes Colorado's attempt to disqualify Trump from the 2024 ballot and the subsequent legal challenges leading to the U.S. Supreme Court's involvement.
  • The article addresses critical legal questions, including who has standing to file suit and whether states can define "engaging in insurrection."
  • It scrutinizes whether the term "Officer of the United States" in the Fourteenth Amendment applies to elected officials like Trump.
  • The distinction between disqualification from holding office and running for office is explored, with reference to various state court rulings.
  • The article considers the constitutional framework for governance and the potential political repercussions of disqualifying Trump without a criminal conviction.

What They Recommend:

  • Levy suggests a careful interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment, emphasizing its historical context and legal precedents.
  • The author recommends that the Supreme Court provide clarity on the application of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Key Takeaways:

  • The debate over Trump's disqualification centers on constitutional interpretation, especially the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • The U.S. Supreme Court's decision will have significant implications for electoral law and the definition of insurrection in a political context.
  • The issue raises broader questions about the balance between legal standards and political decision-making in the American democratic process.

This is a brief overview of Robert A. Levy's work from the Cato Institute. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Rethinking Technology Transfer Policy toward China
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Rethinking Technology Transfer Policy toward China

Summary
  • Current methods like export controls are not enough to change China's practices on stolen technology, and the West needs to work together prevent this.
  • The article emphasizes a coordinated diplomatic effort to make China a responsible participant in global markets, focusing on reducing China's unfair trade behaviors and holding it accountable for its actions.
Centrist
Research
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Assessing Israel’s Strike on Iran
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Assessing Israel’s Strike on Iran

Summary
  • Israel conducted a precision strike on an Iranian air defense system, signaling its capability and restraint to avoid broader conflict.
  • The attack was a response to an unprecedented direct missile and drone attack by Iran on Israeli soil, marking a significant escalation in their long-standing tensions.

Centrist
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The Consequences of China’s New Rare Earths Export Restrictions
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

The Consequences of China’s New Rare Earths Export Restrictions

Summary

New export restrictions imposed by China on rare earth elements have significant implications for U.S. sourcing of these critical materials, particularly for defense technologies. The restrictions require licenses for exports, potentially disrupting supply chains and impacting U.S. firms, especially in the defense sector, per commentary from Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Centrist
Article
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
How Trump Sees Allies and Partners
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

How Trump Sees Allies and Partners

Summary

With Donald Trump's potential return to the White House, global partners must adapt to a shift toward an "America First" foreign policy. This approach prioritizes U.S. interests and presents a more unpredictable stance towards international relations, per commentary from Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Centrist
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Seeding Security: Why Agrobiodiversity Loss Threatens National Security
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Seeding Security: Why Agrobiodiversity Loss Threatens National Security

Summary

Agrobiodiversity loss poses significant risks to food security and may undermine political stability. Protecting diverse agricultural species is crucial for sustaining food production and responding to environmental challenges, per commentary from Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Centrist
Commentary
·
Climate Change
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.