Brookings
·
Published
August 5, 2024
Share this article

Summary

  • Comfort Oshagbemi and David Wessel at Brookings examine why the U.S. spends substantially more on transportation infrastructure compared to other countries, highlighting limited state DOT capacity and over-reliance on consultants as key cost-drivers.
  • The authors argue that limited competition and insufficient bidder outreach in the market for government construction contracts contribute to higher infrastructure costs in the U.S., and increasing bidder outreach and improving project planning can significantly reduce these costs.

Overview:

This article was written by Comfort Oshagbemi and David Wessel at Brookings.

  • The high cost of infrastructure in the U.S. is partly due to the limited capacity of state departments of transportation (DOTs) and the over-reliance on consultants.
  • Limited competition in the market for government construction contracts also drives up costs.

Key Quotes:

  • “A one standard deviation increase in state capacity (measured by state DOT employment per capita) is correlated with 16% lower costs.”
  • “An additional bidder on a project was associated with 8.3% lower costs, approximately $460,000 for the average project.”

What They Discuss:

  • U.S. infrastructure costs three times as much on a per-mile basis compared to other upper- and middle-income countries.
  • State DOTs report severe understaffing and an over-reliance on consultants, leading to higher costs; a one standard deviation increase in consultant use is associated with 20% higher costs per lane-mile.
  • A lack of competition in the bidding process for government construction contracts further increases costs; enhancing bidder outreach can reduce costs by 17.6%.
  • The performance of individual engineers significantly impacts project costs; replacing a high-cost engineer with a median-cost engineer can reduce costs by 5.3% per mile.
  • Better planning and providing more bid details are associated with lower costs, while frequent change orders due to poor planning lead to higher expenditures.

What They Recommend:

  • Increase the staffing capacity of state DOTs to reduce reliance on costly consultants.
  • Enhance outreach efforts to potential bidders to increase competition and lower costs.
  • Focus on better planning and providing detailed project information to minimize costly change orders.
  • Invest in training and capacity-building for state engineers to ensure more consistent and efficient project management.

Key Takeaways:

  • High U.S. infrastructure costs can be mitigated by strengthening state DOT capacities and encouraging competitive bidding.
  • Proper planning and detailed bidding information can significantly reduce project costs.
  • Addressing staffing and competitive challenges can lead to substantial cost savings on infrastructure projects.

This is a brief overview of the article by Comfort Oshagbemi and David Wessel at Brookings. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
How voters feel about the economy: 4 takeaways from the latest polls
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

How voters feel about the economy: 4 takeaways from the latest polls

Summary
  • Brookings expert William A. Galston reviews four recent polls of U.S. voters on the economy, comparing Biden and Trump on their economic records.
  • Sixty-five percent of voters rate the economy as good during Trump’s presidency, compared to 38% under Biden.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The hard truth about Biden’s coming retaliation for the killing of US troops
Atlantic Council
·
Nov 18, 2023

The hard truth about Biden’s coming retaliation for the killing of US troops

Summary
  • President Biden's public statements on the drone attack that killed 3 U.S. soldiers in Jordan shows the U.S. is keen to avoid war with Iran while focusing on Hezbollah's activities.
  • The drone attack represents a significant escalation, marking the first US military casualty by enemy air power since 1953 and prompting a strategic withdrawal of Hezbollah from aggressive engagements with US forces in Iraq and Syria.
Leans Right
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Biden at the Three-Year Mark: The Most Active Immigration Presidency Yet Is Mired in Border Crisis Narrative
Migration Policy Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Biden at the Three-Year Mark: The Most Active Immigration Presidency Yet Is Mired in Border Crisis Narrative

Summary
  • The Biden administration has taken a proactive approach to immigration with 535 immigration actions, surpassing the Trump administration in the number of executive actions.
  • The administration's immigration actions have led to legal immigration returning to and surpassing pre-pandemic levels, with refugee admissions on pace to reach the highs of the 1990s.
Leans Left
Report
·
Immigration
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
What is Russia’s role in the Israel-Gaza crisis?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

What is Russia’s role in the Israel-Gaza crisis?

Summary
  • Recent developments, particularly Russia's involvement in Ukraine and its reliance on Iran, have strained its relations with Israel, marking a departure from the previously improving ties under Putin's leadership.
  • Russia's strategic positioning in the Middle East, balancing relationships with Israel, Iran, and Saudi Arabia, aiming to be a central player capable of engaging with all sides.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
Ukraine-Russia War
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
How the prospect of a second Trump presidency is already shaping geopolitics
Atlantic Council
·
Nov 18, 2023

How the prospect of a second Trump presidency is already shaping geopolitics

Summary
  • The potential return of Donald Trump as President is influencing foreign governments' policy decisions, with some delaying actions in hope of better negotiations and others preparing for less favorable outcomes.
  • The uncertainty surrounding US foreign policy under a potential Trump administration is causing both allies and adversaries to adjust their strategies far ahead of the US elections.
Leans Right
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.