Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
·
Published
July 31, 2024

Why Is It So Hard for China to Boost Domestic Demand?

Liberal
Commentary
·
U.S.-China Relations
Share this article

Summary

  • Experts at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace argue that China's Third Plenum communiqué remains vague on demand-side measures, even though boosting consumption is widely seen as crucial for sustainable growth.

  • The analysis suggests that despite consensus on the need for stronger consumer demand, Beijing faces challenges in shifting from an investment-driven economy due to long-standing transfers that benefit manufacturing, infrastructure, and local governments at the expense of households.

Overview:

This article was written by Michael Pettis at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

  • The Chinese Communist Party's recent Third Plenum communiqué focused more on supply-side measures than demand-side initiatives, despite widespread consensus that boosting consumption is essential for sustainable growth.
  • Structural, supply-side changes are vital to enhancing consumption’s role in China’s economy, but these are complex and have far-reaching consequences.

Key Quotes:

  • "Beijing has been unable to shift the economy away from its overreliance on investment—and, more recently, on its trade surplus—to maintain high growth rates."
  • "Thanks to these direct and implicit transfers, in other words, China’s extremely competitive manufacturing—and the world’s best transportation and logistical infrastructure—should not be thought of as separate from the country’s extraordinarily low domestic consumption."

What They Discuss:

  • Consumption accounts for approximately 75% of GDP globally, but only about 53-54% in China, with investment constituting 42-43% of GDP.
  • Despite general agreement among economists, China remains heavily reliant on investment rather than consumption for economic growth.
  • Structural transfers in China—such as repressed interest rates and a rigorous credit system—have subsidized businesses and investment at the expense of households.
  • China’s hukou system and other policies have kept wages and household income growth subdued, further limiting consumption.
  • Inefficient investment, particularly in infrastructure, has led to rising local government debt without corresponding economic benefits.

What They Recommend:

  • Implementing fiscal stimulus directed at the demand side would offer a temporary boost to household consumption but is not a sustainable long-term solution due to debt concerns.
  • Gradually reversing structural transfers to allow household income to grow faster than GDP presents a more sustainable, albeit challenging, approach.
  • Reforming inefficient investment practices and ensuring more resources go towards households would support sustainable consumption growth.

Key Takeaways:

  • Boosting consumption in China is a complex challenge deeply intertwined with the country’s overall economic structure.
  • Temporary fiscal measures alone are insufficient; long-term structural changes are necessary to sustainably enhance the role of consumption.
  • Any significant shift in policy could potentially impact China’s manufacturing competitiveness and lead to short-term economic contractions.
  • Structural reforms pose a challenge as they involve redistributing resources from businesses and local governments to households.

This is a brief overview of the article by Michael Pettis at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Trump 2.0: A Survival Guide for Democrats
American Enterprise Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump 2.0: A Survival Guide for Democrats

Summary

The Democratic Party is currently facing significant challenges in regaining favor after recent electoral losses, as only 33 percent of Americans view the party positively. The party's struggle to adapt and connect with voters indicates a pressing need for strategic changes to compete effectively in future elections, per commentary from American Enterprise Institute.

Conservative
Op-Ed
·
U.S. Government & Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
How federal layoffs set the stage for greater privatization and automation of the US government
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

How federal layoffs set the stage for greater privatization and automation of the US government

Summary

The federal government's effort to downsize may lead to increased privatization and automation. This shift raises concerns about the accessibility and fairness of services for Americans reliant on government support, per commentary from Brookings.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
U.S. Government & Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Domestic Deployment of the Military: The Past, Present, and Potential Future
Center for American Progress
·
Nov 18, 2023

Domestic Deployment of the Military: The Past, Present, and Potential Future

Summary

In exploring how military deployment could shape domestic governance, recent discussions highlight potential risks under the Trump administration. The report indicates that such actions, unless carefully monitored, could undermine constitutional safeguards and public safety, per commentary from Center for American Progress.

Progressive
Report
·
U.S. Military & Defense
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The Art of a Good Deal: Ukraine’s Strategic Economic Opportunity for the United States
Council on Foreign Relations
·
Nov 18, 2023

The Art of a Good Deal: Ukraine’s Strategic Economic Opportunity for the United States

Summary

Ukraine presents a strategic economic opportunity for the United States, particularly as the nation is rich in critical minerals and advanced technology sectors. Investing in Ukraine not only enhances economic ties but also fortifies U.S. national security interests amid geopolitical tensions, per commentary from Council on Foreign Relations.

Center
Commentary
·
Ukraine-Russia War
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Tariffs on Canada and Mexico could hurt Trump’s quest for US energy dominance
Atlantic Council
·
Nov 18, 2023

Tariffs on Canada and Mexico could hurt Trump’s quest for US energy dominance

Summary

Tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico could significantly undermine U.S. energy dominance by raising domestic energy prices and disrupting critical supply chains. These actions may drive U.S. trading partners to seek alternatives, diminishing American competitiveness in energy exports, per commentary from Atlantic Council.

Leans Right
Commentary
·
Global Economy
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.