Brookings
·
Published
July 8, 2024

With AI, we need both competition and safety

Leans Left
Commentary
·
Artificial Intelligence
Share this article

Summary

  • Tom Wheeler and Blair Levin at Brookings argue that the FTC and DOJ should investigate AI collaborations and transactions for antitrust concerns while simultaneously encouraging AI safety standards through industry cooperation.
  • They propose a model that balances competition and AI safety, advocating supervised processes, market incentives, and regulatory oversight to ensure AI companies collaborate on safety without undermining competitive markets.

Overview:  

This article was written by Tom Wheeler and Blair Levin at Brookings.

  • The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Department of Justice (DOJ) are investigating AI collaborations for potential antitrust violations due to concerns over market concentration and competition.
  • AI safety should be a priority alongside competition, suggesting collaborations to set safety standards without disincentivizing competitive practices.

Key Quotes:

  • "Building the AI future around competition and safety should be a no-brainer."
  • "AI may be new, but the responsibilities of AI companies to protect their users have been around for literally hundreds of years."

What They Discuss:

  • The potential of AI to surpass human cognitive abilities in the near future and the consequent risks involved.
  • The importance of creating uniformly applicable safety standards to prevent a "race to the bottom."
  • Examples of effective industry-government collaborations, such as the American Medical Association's standards for doctors and the FINRA’s regulations in the financial industry.
  • The necessity for transparency and ongoing oversight in ensuring AI safety standards.
  • Historical precedents like the Cybersecurity Social Contract, which balanced collaboration and compliance with antitrust laws.

What They Recommend:

  • Encourage collaboration between AI companies to establish and adhere to AI safety standards.
  • Develop a model that evolves as technology advances and incentivizes companies to exceed baseline safety standards.
  • Ensure transparency and oversight to enforce compliance and protect public welfare.
  • Draw lessons from successful industry-government collaborations to create enforceable AI safety standards.
  • Clarify government policy to support AI safety collaborations without impeding competition through an executive order or joint FTC/DOJ statement.

Key Takeaways:

  • AI development must balance safety and competition to protect public interests while fostering innovation.
  • Collaboration on AI safety is necessary and can coexist with competitive practices, as evidenced by historical regulatory examples.
  • The government needs to adopt a supervisory rather than a dictatorial role in enforcing AI safety standards.
  • Clear policies and collaborative frameworks are essential to achieve safe and competitive AI markets.

This is a brief overview of the article by Tom Wheeler and Blair Levin at Brookings. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
U.S.-China Competition and Military AI: How Washington Can Manage Strategic Risks amid Rivalry with Beijing
Center for a New American Security
·
Nov 18, 2023

U.S.-China Competition and Military AI: How Washington Can Manage Strategic Risks amid Rivalry with Beijing

Summary
  • This report highlights the intersection of growing U.S.-China geopolitical rivalry and the rapid development of military AI and how the U.S. can manage strategic risks.
  • It discusses China's integration of AI into its military and civilian sectors, proposes ways for the U.S. to limit China's military AI progress.
Center Left
Report
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump’s Disqualification: A Primer
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump’s Disqualification: A Primer

Summary
  • Cato Institute expert Robert A. Levy writes that U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts will be "concerned about political repercussions" if Trump is disqualified from running.
  • Levy also argues that liberal justices will likely lean toward allowing voting citizens to decide if Trump should be President.
Libertarian
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
It’s Not Just Republicans, Democrats Want Trillion‐​Dollar Tax Cuts Too
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

It’s Not Just Republicans, Democrats Want Trillion‐​Dollar Tax Cuts Too

Summary
  • Both Republicans and Democrats agree on tax cuts, though they propose different types and have varied economic implications.
  • Democrats passed a nearly trillion-dollar corporate tax cut through the Inflation Reduction Act and support large increases in child and earned income tax credits.
Libertarian
Blog
·
U.S. Economy
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
National Action Plan for U.S. Leadership in Biotechnology
Special Competitive Studies Project
·
Nov 18, 2023

National Action Plan for U.S. Leadership in Biotechnology

Summary
  • National strategy plan proposes "biotech moonshots", global biotech standards, and securing biotech platforms against rival nations, especially China.
  • The plan stresses treating genomic data as a strategic resource and highlights the potential of biotechnology to revolutionize sectors like health and agriculture.
Bipartisan
Report
·
Emerging Technology
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.