Cato Institute
·
Published
December 12, 2023
Share this article

Summary

  • The Biden administration's latest request for $61 billion for Ukraine would bring the total U.S. support since 2022 to nearly $200 billion.
  • The authors question the feasibility of a Ukrainian victory and the U.S.'s ability to sustain financial support given its fiscal challenges.|

Overview:

This commentary piece by Justin Logan and Dan Caldwell at the Cato Institute critiques President Biden's approach to supporting Ukraine, arguing that the United States has overextended its resources. They assert that the Biden administration's request for additional funding for Ukraine is unsustainable given the U.S.'s fiscal position and the uncertain prospects of a Ukrainian victory.

Key Points:

  1. The Biden administration's latest request for $61 billion for Ukraine would bring the total U.S. support since 2022 to nearly $200 billion.
  2. The authors question the feasibility of a Ukrainian victory and the U.S.'s ability to sustain financial support given its fiscal challenges.|

Key Quotes:

  1. "The Biden administration continues to publicly advance the delusion that Ukraine can achieve a total and decisive victory against Russia."
  2. "Interest on the debt is now roughly $1 trillion per year, the national debt itself is at almost $34 trillion, and the budget deficit each year is some $1.5 trillion and expected to jump to almost $3 trillion by 2033."

What They Discuss:

  • The impact of U.S. support for Ukraine on the country's ammunition stockpiles and its ability to support other allies.
  • The challenges in achieving a meaningful Ukrainian breakthrough against Russia in the near term.
  • The risks of escalating the conflict in Ukraine and the high rates of munition expenditure.
  • The dire U.S. fiscal position, including a growing national debt and budget deficit, which makes continued support for Ukraine unsustainable.

What They Recommend:

  • Congress should reject the latest funding request for Ukraine due to the lack of a clear plan for victory and the U.S.'s precarious fiscal position.
  • The U.S. should reconsider its approach to the conflict in Ukraine, focusing on diplomatic solutions rather than continued military support.​

Key Takeaways:

  • The commentary highlights the fiscal and strategic challenges of the U.S.'s continued support for Ukraine.
  • It emphasizes the need for a reassessment of U.S. foreign policy priorities and fiscal responsibilities.
  • The authors argue for a more cautious approach to international conflicts, considering the U.S.'s domestic fiscal challenges.​

This is a brief overview of the commentary from the Cato Institute. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Reducing US oil demand, not production, is the way forward for the climate
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Reducing US oil demand, not production, is the way forward for the climate

Summary
  • Brookings expert Samantha Gross writes that reducing oil production in the U.S. will not significantly impact global oil production, as other producers can easily fill the gap.
  • Changing the transportation system from gasoline and diesel to electricity is key to reducing oil demand and greenhouse gas emissions.
Leans Left
Research
·
Climate Change
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump wins Iowa — no surprises there. What happens next?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump wins Iowa — no surprises there. What happens next?

Summary
  • Trump's win in Iowa was expected, and he secured over 50% of the vote, performing well across various voter groups.
  • The race for second place was also as predicted, with Ron DeSantis and Nikki Haley finishing second and third, respectively.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Whose Ground Zero? Competing Perspectives of the Israel-Hamas War
German Marshall Fund
·
Nov 18, 2023

Whose Ground Zero? Competing Perspectives of the Israel-Hamas War

Summary
  • The U.S. and Europe's pro-Israel stance in the war in Gaza, coupled with their response to Ukraine, is leading to global criticism and a potential shift in international relations, isolating them from non-Western countries.
  • This situation offers autocratic nations like China, Iran, and Russia an opportunity to increase their influence, exploiting perceptions of Western moral inconsistency and opportunism.
Nonpartisan
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Should America have trillionaires?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Should America have trillionaires?

Summary
  • Brookings expert Darrell M. West highlights the growing income inequality in the U.S., where the top 10% of income earners now receive 48% of the country's total income.
  • "Left unchecked, extraordinary money can lead to preferential economic treatment, advantageous political access, and unfair policy benefits."
Leans Left
Commentary
·
Culture & Society
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Will Support for Israel Cost Biden Michigan?
American Enterprise Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Will Support for Israel Cost Biden Michigan?

Summary
  • AEI experts explore the potential political impact of President Biden's support for Israel on his electoral prospects in Michigan, particularly among Muslim and Arab American voters.
  • The shift in Arab American support away from Biden in Michigan is important, but it is unlikely to be the sole deciding factor in Michigan's electoral outcome.
Conservative
Blog
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.