Heritage Foundation
·
Published
September 4, 2024

Bring Back Trump’s China Policy

Conservative
Commentary
·
U.S.-China Relations
Share this article

Summary

  • Bryan Burack at Heritage Foundation writes that the Trump administration's significant foreign policy legacy was its strategic response to China's economic warfare against the U.S., emphasizing the importance of maintaining these measures for deterrence.
  • The article asserts that the Biden administration has adopted a less assertive approach, reviving engagement policies with China due to concerns that aggressive economic protections might provoke conflict, which has led to counterproductive security tradeoffs.

Overview:  

This article was written by Bryan Burack at the Heritage Foundation.

  • The Trump administration's significant foreign policy legacy is its proactive response to China's economic strategies against the United States.
  • The Biden administration, although continuing some of Trump's economic and tech policies toward China, has softened its overall approach due to concerns about perceived provocations.

Key Quotes:  

  • "The Trump administration’s most important foreign policy legacy is its much-needed response to China’s economic warfare against the United States."
  • "The Biden administration has watered down its overall approach due to fears that aggressively protecting the U.S. economy may be too provocative."

What They Discuss:  

  • The contrasting approaches of the Trump and Biden administrations regarding U.S. economic policies towards China, with the former adopting a more antagonistic stance and the latter emphasizing engagement.
  • Even while continuing some policies, the Biden administration has taken actions to reassure China, which some view as weakening the U.S. position.
  • Concerns from both political spectrums that rigorous economic measures could provoke China into conflict if enforced without a strong military position.
  • Arguments against the belief that the U.S. is "strangling" China's economy, pointing out that both nations remain heavily interdependent economically.
  • The inevitability of decoupling in critical economic sectors as pushed by the Chinese government itself, which has been preparing to become more self-reliant.

What They Recommend:  

  • Maintain and continue the economic and technological measures initiated by the Trump administration to reduce dependencies on China.
  • Strengthen America’s defense industrial base and address supply chain vulnerabilities to ensure credible military deterrence.
  • Acknowledge and prepare for the inevitability of some form of economic decoupling from China, acting from a position of strength.

Key Takeaways:  

  • The U.S. should continue efforts to reduce reliance on China to maintain national security and economic stability.
  • Assertive economic policies are essential to deter Chinese aggression effectively.
  • The current U.S.-China relationship dynamic is not akin to the pre-WWII U.S.-Japan scenario in terms of economic measures.
  • Decoupling in sensitive sectors is perceived as inevitable and is being actively pursued by China's own policy goals.
  • Ensuring America's economic security will make the country more resilient and better positioned to counter China's growing influence.

This is a brief overview of the article by Bryan Burack at Heritage Foundation. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Trump wins Iowa — no surprises there. What happens next?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump wins Iowa — no surprises there. What happens next?

Summary
  • Trump's win in Iowa was expected, and he secured over 50% of the vote, performing well across various voter groups.
  • The race for second place was also as predicted, with Ron DeSantis and Nikki Haley finishing second and third, respectively.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Whose Ground Zero? Competing Perspectives of the Israel-Hamas War
German Marshall Fund
·
Nov 18, 2023

Whose Ground Zero? Competing Perspectives of the Israel-Hamas War

Summary
  • The U.S. and Europe's pro-Israel stance in the war in Gaza, coupled with their response to Ukraine, is leading to global criticism and a potential shift in international relations, isolating them from non-Western countries.
  • This situation offers autocratic nations like China, Iran, and Russia an opportunity to increase their influence, exploiting perceptions of Western moral inconsistency and opportunism.
Nonpartisan
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Should America have trillionaires?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Should America have trillionaires?

Summary
  • Brookings expert Darrell M. West highlights the growing income inequality in the U.S., where the top 10% of income earners now receive 48% of the country's total income.
  • "Left unchecked, extraordinary money can lead to preferential economic treatment, advantageous political access, and unfair policy benefits."
Leans Left
Commentary
·
Culture & Society
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Will Support for Israel Cost Biden Michigan?
American Enterprise Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Will Support for Israel Cost Biden Michigan?

Summary
  • AEI experts explore the potential political impact of President Biden's support for Israel on his electoral prospects in Michigan, particularly among Muslim and Arab American voters.
  • The shift in Arab American support away from Biden in Michigan is important, but it is unlikely to be the sole deciding factor in Michigan's electoral outcome.
Conservative
Blog
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Pay Attention to the Arab Public Response to the Israel-Hamas War
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
·
Nov 18, 2023

Pay Attention to the Arab Public Response to the Israel-Hamas War

Summary
  • The Arab public's response to the Israel-Hamas conflict is increasingly characterized by a preference for nonviolent, pro-peace approaches.
  • There is a significant shift in the Arab world towards rejecting violence and extremist ideologies, as evidenced by public opinion surveys.
Liberal
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.