American Enterprise Institute
·
Published
January 18, 2024

Democracy v. the Constitution in the Trump Case

Conservative
Blog
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Share this article

Summary

  • AEI scholar Peter J. Wallison writes that the Trump case highlights the delicate balance between democracy and constitutional safeguards in the United States.
  • The decision of the Supreme Court in this case could have significant implications for the interpretation of constitutional democracy, as well as the importance of public awareness and understanding of constitutional issues in democratic societies.

Overview:

  • This article by Peter J. Wallison at American Enterprise Institute discusses the Supreme Court's decision to hear Donald Trump's appeal regarding his eligibility to become President again under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
  • The case presents a conflict between Trump's public support and the constitutional language.
  • The article explores the tension between democracy and constitutional limits in the context of Trump's actions after the 2020 election.

Key Quotes:

  1. "The United States is a constitutional democracy; the people have the right to vote for their leaders, but only within rules set by the Constitution."
  2. "The mere fact that Trump believes he has the power he claimed makes him a menace to all as President."

What They Discuss:

  • The constitutional debate over Trump's eligibility for the presidency based on his actions after the 2020 election.
  • The role of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment in disqualifying individuals who have broken their oath to support the Constitution.
  • Trump's alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election results and the implications for his eligibility.
  • The broader implications of Trump's actions for the principles of constitutional democracy in the United States.
  • The lack of public awareness about the specifics of Trump's actions and the role of the media in this context.

What They Recommend:

  • The article suggests a need for careful consideration of constitutional principles in deciding Trump's eligibility for a second term.
  • It emphasizes the importance of upholding the Constitution over popular support in democratic governance.

Key Takeaways:

  • The Trump case highlights the delicate balance between democracy and constitutional safeguards in the United States.
  • The decision of the Supreme Court in this case could have significant implications for the interpretation of constitutional democracy.
  • The article underscores the importance of public awareness and understanding of constitutional issues in democratic societies.​

This is a brief overview of Peter J. Wallison's work from the American Enterprise Institute. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Gender Wars Are an Early Warning Sign for Authoritarianism
RAND Corporation
·
Nov 18, 2023

Gender Wars Are an Early Warning Sign for Authoritarianism

Summary

Gender wars highlight the rise of authoritarianism globally, as seen in Georgia's struggle for democracy against Russian influence. Women leaders across various nations are pivotal in resisting these trends, emphasizing their essential role in safeguarding freedoms and rights, per commentary from RAND Corporation.  

Center
Commentary
·
U.S. Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
How federal layoffs set the stage for greater privatization and automation of the US government
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

How federal layoffs set the stage for greater privatization and automation of the US government

Summary

The federal government's effort to downsize may lead to increased privatization and automation. This shift raises concerns about the accessibility and fairness of services for Americans reliant on government support, per commentary from Brookings.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
U.S. Government & Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The Consequences of China’s New Rare Earths Export Restrictions
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

The Consequences of China’s New Rare Earths Export Restrictions

Summary

New export restrictions imposed by China on rare earth elements have significant implications for U.S. sourcing of these critical materials, particularly for defense technologies. The restrictions require licenses for exports, potentially disrupting supply chains and impacting U.S. firms, especially in the defense sector, per commentary from Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Centrist
Article
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The presidential debate accomplished more for Harris than it did for Trump
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

The presidential debate accomplished more for Harris than it did for Trump

Summary

President Trump’s latest tariff plan is under fire from a conservative think tank, which says the math behind it is both flawed and misleading.

  • Donald Trump focused on separating himself from his party's extreme policies and addressing key voter concerns like the economy and abortion.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump’s Disqualification: A Primer
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump’s Disqualification: A Primer

Summary

Cato Institute expert Robert A. Levy writes that U.S. SupremeCourt Chief Justice Roberts will be "concerned about political repercussions" if Trump is disqualified from running.

Levy also argues that liberal justices will likely lean toward allowing voting citizens to decide if Trump should be President.

Libertarian
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.