Cato Institute
·
Published
December 29, 2024

Invading Mexico Will Not Solve the Cartel Problem

Libertarian
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Share this article

Summary

Invading Mexico will not effectively resolve the cartel problem and may worsen existing issues, such as migration and international relations. Military incursions could undermine bilateral cooperation and fail to yield strategic success, posing significant risks to U.S. interests, per commentary from Cato Institute.

Invading Mexico will not effectively resolve the cartel problem and may worsen existing issues, such as migration and international relations. Military incursions could undermine bilateral cooperation and fail to yield strategic success, posing significant risks to U.S. interests, per commentary from Cato Institute.

The issue:  

The core challenge lies in addressing the complex and resilient nature of drug cartels in Mexico, which continue to thrive despite previous military efforts. Proposals for U.S. military action overlook historical insights, where past interventions did not eliminate cartel influence and often worsened violence.

What they recommend:  

No recommendations provided in the commentary.

Go deeper:  

Past military actions have shown that cartels adapt quickly, with violence often increasing despite tactical victories. Moreover, military incursions could severely damage U.S.-Mexico relations, which are crucial for joint efforts in managing migration and countering China’s growing influence. Understanding local dynamics and political support is essential for any proposed solution, highlighting the complexity of the issue.

This is a brief overview of a commentary from Cato Institute. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full commentary.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
How the prospect of a second Trump presidency is already shaping geopolitics
Atlantic Council
·
Nov 18, 2023

How the prospect of a second Trump presidency is already shaping geopolitics

Summary
  • The potential return of Donald Trump as President is influencing foreign governments' policy decisions, with some delaying actions in hope of better negotiations and others preparing for less favorable outcomes.
  • The uncertainty surrounding US foreign policy under a potential Trump administration is causing both allies and adversaries to adjust their strategies far ahead of the US elections.
Leans Right
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
How President Biden is appeasing bad actors
Texas Public Policy Foundation
·
Nov 18, 2023

How President Biden is appeasing bad actors

Summary
  • The Biden administration's appeasement of authoritarian regimes in South America have not stopped the outflow of refugees and migrants trying to enter the U.S.
  • Lifting previous oil & gas sanctions on the Maduro regime in exchange for free elections have not worked, with Venezuelans now the fastest-growing immigrant group in the U.S.
Conservative
Commentary
·
Immigration
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Should the US pursue a new Cold War with China?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Should the US pursue a new Cold War with China?

Summary
  • Brookings experts debate the applicability of the Cold War analogy to the current U.S.-China relationship, considering the economic, political, and military dimensions.
  • While the U.S. and China are in a state of competition, it differs fundamentally from the U.S.-Soviet Cold War, particularly due to economic interdependence. China's rise and its political model present unique challenges, but it does not seek to overthrow democratic regimes or force its political model on others.
Leans Left
Research
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Don’t Hold Up Israel Aid to Further Ukraine War Funding
Heritage Foundation
·
Nov 18, 2023

Don’t Hold Up Israel Aid to Further Ukraine War Funding

Summary
  • Heritage Foundation scholars emphasize that the U.S. should not compromise its support for Israel, a key ally in the Middle East, in favor of additional funding for Ukraine.
  • The commentary highlights the distinct nature of the conflicts in Ukraine and Israel and the need for separate responses.
Conservative
Commentary
·
Ukraine-Russia War
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Extremist Israeli settlers are nonstate armed actors
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Extremist Israeli settlers are nonstate armed actors

Summary
  • Brookings expert Jeffrey Feltman discuss the escalating violence by extremist Israeli settlers against Palestinian civilians in the West Bank and the implications for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
  • He argues that these Israeli settlers should be considered nonstate armed actors (NSAA) and suggests that the U.S. should take stronger actions against them, similar to measures used against Palestinian terrorism.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.