Cato Institute
·
Published
December 5, 2023
Share this article

Summary

  • Both Republicans and Democrats agree on tax cuts, though they propose different types and have varied economic implications.
  • Democrats passed a nearly trillion-dollar corporate tax cut through the Inflation Reduction Act and support large increases in child and earned income tax credits.

Overview:

  • This article was written by Adam N. Michel, published on the Cato at Liberty Blog at the Cato Institute.
  • It discusses the bipartisan nature of tax cut support in American politics, highlighting the complexity of fiscal policy beyond partisan lines.
  • The piece also addresses the impending fiscal deadlines and the need for realistic budget planning.

Key Quotes:

  1. "Both Republicans and Democrats want to keep taxes from rising on the vast majority of Americans, and most legislators also want to protect higher-income Americans from punishingly higher taxes."
  2. "Policymakers’ instincts are correct; it is best to keep taxes low on Americans at every income level. However, keeping taxes low will require spending cuts."

What They Discuss:

  • The continuation of the 2017 tax cuts, supported by President Biden, which would cost between $1.7 trillion and $2.5 trillion.
  • The bipartisan agreement on tax cuts, with both parties proposing different types of cuts, yet generally aiming to reduce federal revenues.
  • Democrat-supported tax cut initiatives, like the child tax credit and earned income tax credit, estimated to cost around $1.7 trillion over ten years.
  • The fiscal challenges of extending the 2017 tax cuts without specific new taxes or spending cuts to offset the cost.
  • The projected rise in budget deficits to approximately $2.8 trillion a year by 2033, even with automatic tax increases post-2025.

What They Recommend:

  • The author suggests that maintaining low taxes for Americans at all income levels will necessitate significant spending cuts.
  • A call for realistic offsets and financial planning in order to reconcile the desire for tax cuts with the current spending levels and budget deficits.

Key Takeaways:

  • There is a general bipartisan consensus on the desirability of tax cuts, though differences exist in the types of cuts each party supports.
  • The extension of the 2017 tax cuts is a significant fiscal challenge, requiring careful balancing of tax policies and spending reforms.
  • The need for a realistic approach to fiscal policy that addresses the growing budget deficit while accommodating the bipartisan desire for tax cuts.

This is a brief overview of Adam N. Michel's article from the Cato Institute. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Breaking Down the Biden Administration’s National Rent Stabilization Proposal
Urban Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Breaking Down the Biden Administration’s National Rent Stabilization Proposal

Summary
  • Urban Institute experts write that the Biden administration's rent stabilization proposal aims to cap annual rent increases at 5% for units owned by large landlords, conditioned on maintaining existing tax breaks, aiming to stabilize housing and protect tenants from eviction or displacement.
  • The experts argue that while the proposal could make more units affordable for low-income residents, it may also reduce the overall supply of rental units as landlords might convert properties or avoid entering the market, potentially driving up rents for uncontrolled units.
Liberal
Policy Analysis
·
U.S. Economy
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
How AI Might Affect Decisionmaking in a National Security Crisis
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
·
Nov 18, 2023

How AI Might Affect Decisionmaking in a National Security Crisis

Summary
  • Christopher S. Chivvis and Jennifer Kavanagh at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace discuss the potential for AI to both enhance and complicate decision-making within the U.S. National Security Council, highlighting challenges like information overload and misperceptions.
  • The article asserts that advanced AI could combat groupthink by offering diverse perspectives but also risks intensifying it due to overconfidence in AI systems, and emphasizes the need for training and AI governance to ensure effective use and stability in crises.
Liberal
Policy Analysis
·
Artificial Intelligence
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Is Kamala Harris leading Donald Trump in the presidential race?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Is Kamala Harris leading Donald Trump in the presidential race?

Summary
  • Experts at Brookings argue that Kamala Harris has regained lost ground for the Democrats, erasing the "enthusiasm gap" and leading in both national and key swing state polls against Donald Trump.
  • They examine the reliability of poll averages, highlighting historical underestimation of Trump’s support and the necessity for Harris to maintain significant momentum to secure victory.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump misses a golden opportunity in his acceptance speech
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump misses a golden opportunity in his acceptance speech

Summary
  • Elaine Kamarck and William A. Galston at Brookings examine that the Republican National Convention highlighted a stark contrast between a verbose Trump and a struggling Biden, leading to widespread speculation about Biden's potential exit and Kamala Harris's possible rise as the Democratic candidate.
  • The article argues that while Trump missed an opportunity to solidify his lead with a long-winded, undisciplined speech, Democratic officials and voters are increasingly viewing Biden as a weakened candidate, potentially paving the way for Harris to step in and challenge Trump's controversial policies.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Why is Kamala Harris wrapping up the Democratic nomination so quickly?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Why is Kamala Harris wrapping up the Democratic nomination so quickly?

Summary
  • Elaine Kamarck at Brookings writes that Joe Biden's endorsement of Kamala Harris for the Democratic Party's nomination is due to her extensive presidential-level vetting, practical time constraints, and her robust political experience.

  • The article asserts that Harris' widespread delegate support, substantial financial backing, and the urgent need for party unity and focus on the general election are key reasons for the swift consolidation around her candidacy.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.