Cato Institute
·
Published
December 5, 2023
Share this article

Summary

  • Both Republicans and Democrats agree on tax cuts, though they propose different types and have varied economic implications.
  • Democrats passed a nearly trillion-dollar corporate tax cut through the Inflation Reduction Act and support large increases in child and earned income tax credits.

Overview:

  • This article was written by Adam N. Michel, published on the Cato at Liberty Blog at the Cato Institute.
  • It discusses the bipartisan nature of tax cut support in American politics, highlighting the complexity of fiscal policy beyond partisan lines.
  • The piece also addresses the impending fiscal deadlines and the need for realistic budget planning.

Key Quotes:

  1. "Both Republicans and Democrats want to keep taxes from rising on the vast majority of Americans, and most legislators also want to protect higher-income Americans from punishingly higher taxes."
  2. "Policymakers’ instincts are correct; it is best to keep taxes low on Americans at every income level. However, keeping taxes low will require spending cuts."

What They Discuss:

  • The continuation of the 2017 tax cuts, supported by President Biden, which would cost between $1.7 trillion and $2.5 trillion.
  • The bipartisan agreement on tax cuts, with both parties proposing different types of cuts, yet generally aiming to reduce federal revenues.
  • Democrat-supported tax cut initiatives, like the child tax credit and earned income tax credit, estimated to cost around $1.7 trillion over ten years.
  • The fiscal challenges of extending the 2017 tax cuts without specific new taxes or spending cuts to offset the cost.
  • The projected rise in budget deficits to approximately $2.8 trillion a year by 2033, even with automatic tax increases post-2025.

What They Recommend:

  • The author suggests that maintaining low taxes for Americans at all income levels will necessitate significant spending cuts.
  • A call for realistic offsets and financial planning in order to reconcile the desire for tax cuts with the current spending levels and budget deficits.

Key Takeaways:

  • There is a general bipartisan consensus on the desirability of tax cuts, though differences exist in the types of cuts each party supports.
  • The extension of the 2017 tax cuts is a significant fiscal challenge, requiring careful balancing of tax policies and spending reforms.
  • The need for a realistic approach to fiscal policy that addresses the growing budget deficit while accommodating the bipartisan desire for tax cuts.

This is a brief overview of Adam N. Michel's article from the Cato Institute. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Can Maduro Pull off the Mother of All Electoral Frauds?
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Can Maduro Pull off the Mother of All Electoral Frauds?

Summary
  • Ryan C. Berg and Christopher Hernandez-Roy at Center for Strategic and International Studies analyze that Venezuela's recent elections showcased a blatant electoral theft by President Maduro, who manipulated election conditions, barred opposition candidates, and used repression to secure a disputed victory over Edmundo González.

  • The article asserts that the Maduro regime’s fraudulent actions, including blocking international observations and harassing opposition supporters, risk severe international isolation and a possible constitutional crisis if vote tabulations are not transparently released, undermining any claims to democratic legitimacy.
Leans Right
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Why Is It So Hard for China to Boost Domestic Demand?
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
·
Nov 18, 2023

Why Is It So Hard for China to Boost Domestic Demand?

Summary
  • Experts at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace argue that China's Third Plenum communiqué remains vague on demand-side measures, even though boosting consumption is widely seen as crucial for sustainable growth.

  • The analysis suggests that despite consensus on the need for stronger consumer demand, Beijing faces challenges in shifting from an investment-driven economy due to long-standing transfers that benefit manufacturing, infrastructure, and local governments at the expense of households.
Liberal
Commentary
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
A Cosmopolitan Case against World Government
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

A Cosmopolitan Case against World Government

Summary
  • Ilya Somin at Cato Institute argues that supporting globalization and opposing world government are not contradictory positions because a world government could worsen voter ignorance, hinder foot voting, and potentially spiral into catastrophic authoritarianism.
  • The article asserts that world government is unnecessary for solving global issues and could suppress beneficial diversity and competition between nations. Instead, voluntary cooperation among major powers can address international challenges effectively.
Libertarian
Report
·
U.S. Government & Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Project 2025 Compels Local Prosecutors To Enforce Extreme Right-Wing Laws
Center for American Progress
·
Nov 18, 2023

Project 2025 Compels Local Prosecutors To Enforce Extreme Right-Wing Laws

Summary
  • Lindsey McLendon at Center for American Progress argues that Project 2025 aims to dismantle the U.S. system of checks and balances, granting politicians, judges, and corporations increased control over Americans' lives by enforcing extreme right-wing policies through the U.S. Department of Justice.
  • The Center for American Progress asserts that Project 2025 would pressure local district attorneys to enforce severe abortion bans and other restrictive laws, exacerbating the maternal health crisis and reducing access to essential reproductive healthcare, particularly in states with already high maternal mortality rates.
Progressive
Article
·
U.S. Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump chose Vance to reinforce his message
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump chose Vance to reinforce his message

Summary
  • Elaine Kamarck at Brookings writes that in selecting Senator J.D. Vance as his running mate, Donald Trump aimed to solidify his hard-right agenda, emphasizing Vance's alignment with Trump's core messages and MAGA base.
  • The article examines how Trump's choice of Vance follows the "reinforcing model" of vice-presidential selection, where the VP candidate strengthens the presidential candidate's message and governance, rather than providing a traditional ideological or geographic balance.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.