Special Competitive Studies Project

·

Published

April 1, 2023

National Action Plan for U.S. Leadership in Biotechnology

Bipartisan

Report

·

Emerging Technology

Share this article

Summary

National strategy plan proposes "biotech moonshots", global biotech standards, and securing biotech platforms against rival nations, especially China.
The plan stresses treating genomic data as a strategic resource and highlights the potential of biotechnology to revolutionize sectors like health and agriculture.

Overview:

Authors: Special Competitive Studies Project (SCSP)

Publishing Date: April 23, 2023

Publishing Organization: Special Competitive Studies Project|

Executive Summary:

The Special Competitive Studies Project (SCSP) has released a comprehensive National Action Plan to establish U.S. leadership in biotechnology. This plan outlines strategic initiatives to harness biotechnology's transformative potential for national security, economy, society, and healthcare.

Background:

Biotechnology, a multi-trillion dollar sector, is pivotal in transforming industries like agriculture, health, industrials, materials, and energy. The U.S. currently leads in genetic engineering and molecular biology, but faces competition from countries like China. This plan is part of a broader effort by SCSP to enhance America's competitiveness in emerging technologies.

Issue Description:

The U.S. is at a critical juncture in securing its biotech future. Key challenges include maintaining global leadership, competing with nations like China, integrating biotech across various sectors, and managing the transition from lab breakthroughs to commercialization.

Policy Options:

Investing in Biotech Moonshots: Focusing on projects like the Annotated Non-Human Genome Project and National Medshield.
Strengthening Biotech Infrastructure: Enhancing domestic biomanufacturing capabilities and aligning the biotech standards ecosystem.
Empowering Innovation Ecosystem: Establishing University Centers of Excellence and expanding biomanufacturing institutes.
Building Global Bionet: Creating an early warning system for bio-related incidents.
Developing Talent: Growing a skilled biotech workforce and attracting global talent.

Policy Recommendations:

R&D Investment: Significant investment in biotech research and development.
Public-Private Collaboration: Strengthening partnerships between government, academia, and industry.
Regulatory Framework: Updating regulations to foster innovation and competitiveness.
Global Leadership: Leading global efforts in setting biotech standards and ethics.
Security Protocols: Implementing stringent security measures to safeguard biotech advancements.

Conclusion:

The National Action Plan for U.S. Leadership in Biotechnology is a strategic blueprint for securing America's biotech future. It emphasizes the need for substantial investment, innovative policy-making, and global collaboration. Success in these endeavors will ensure U.S. leadership in biotechnology, benefiting national security, economic growth, and global health.

This policy brief is a high-level summary and does not encompass all the details of the comprehensive plan. For a full understanding, it is recommended to review the entire National Action Plan document.

Related articles

Bring Back Trump’s China Policy

Heritage Foundation

·

Nov 18, 2023

Bring Back Trump’s China Policy

Bryan Burack at Heritage Foundation writes that the Trump administration's significant foreign policy legacy was its strategic response to China's economic warfare against the U.S., emphasizing the importance of maintaining these measures for deterrence.
The article asserts that the Biden administration has adopted a less assertive approach, reviving engagement policies with China due to concerns that aggressive economic protections might provoke conflict, which has led to counterproductive security tradeoffs.

Conservative

Commentary

·

U.S.-China Relations

Project 2025’s Tax Plan Would Raise Taxes on the Middle Class and Cut Taxes for the Wealthy

Center for American Progress

·

Nov 18, 2023

Project 2025’s Tax Plan Would Raise Taxes on the Middle Class and Cut Taxes for the Wealthy

Brendan Duke at Center for American Progress argues that Project 2025 proposes a tax plan that raises taxes on low- and middle-income families while giving significant tax cuts to the wealthy and corporations.
The analysis asserts that the introduction of a flat consumption tax and elimination of income taxes would result in higher costs for middle- and low-income households, shifting the tax burden away from wealthy individuals and large corporations.

Progressive

Commentary

·

2024 U.S. Elections

Kamala Harris’s chances in November could hinge on a women’s voting surge

·

Nov 18, 2023

Kamala Harris’s chances in November could hinge on a women’s voting surge

William H. Frey at Brookings argues that Vice President Kamala Harris's nomination as the Democratic presidential candidate has invigorated the race, with a particular impact on female voters who have historically supported Democratic candidates.

The analysis reviews that women's votes were crucial in recent elections, highlighting how post-Roe v. Wade changes and Harris’s advocacy on women's issues could lead to a significant voting surge, potentially favoring her in the 2024 election.

Leans Left

Commentary

·

2024 U.S. Elections

Why does building and maintaining highways in the US cost so much?

·

Nov 18, 2023

Why does building and maintaining highways in the US cost so much?

Comfort Oshagbemi and David Wessel at Brookings examine why the U.S. spends substantially more on transportation infrastructure compared to other countries, highlighting limited state DOT capacity and over-reliance on consultants as key cost-drivers.
The authors argue that limited competition and insufficient bidder outreach in the market for government construction contracts contribute to higher infrastructure costs in the U.S., and increasing bidder outreach and improving project planning can significantly reduce these costs.

Leans Left

Research

·

U.S. Economy

Trump, Harris, and All the Wrong Ways to Do Tax Reform

·

Nov 18, 2023

Trump, Harris, and All the Wrong Ways to Do Tax Reform

Adam N. Michel at Cato Institute argues that tax policy's prominence in the presidential campaign is due to the impending expiration of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and the candidates' proposals for new special-interest tax breaks that complicate and increase the tax code's complexity.
The report asserts that while there is bipartisan support for extending most of the expiring tax cuts, proposed targeted benefits for tips, families, homeowners, domestic production, and seniors will further complicate the tax system and pose significant fiscal challenges.

Libertarian

Policy Analysis

·

2024 U.S. Elections

No results found.

Original Read Time

9 min

Organization

The Brookings Institution

Category

Israel-Gaza War

Political Ideology

Center Left