Brookings
·
Published
August 5, 2024
Share this article

Summary

  • Comfort Oshagbemi and David Wessel at Brookings examine why the U.S. spends substantially more on transportation infrastructure compared to other countries, highlighting limited state DOT capacity and over-reliance on consultants as key cost-drivers.
  • The authors argue that limited competition and insufficient bidder outreach in the market for government construction contracts contribute to higher infrastructure costs in the U.S., and increasing bidder outreach and improving project planning can significantly reduce these costs.

Overview:

This article was written by Comfort Oshagbemi and David Wessel at Brookings.

  • The high cost of infrastructure in the U.S. is partly due to the limited capacity of state departments of transportation (DOTs) and the over-reliance on consultants.
  • Limited competition in the market for government construction contracts also drives up costs.

Key Quotes:

  • “A one standard deviation increase in state capacity (measured by state DOT employment per capita) is correlated with 16% lower costs.”
  • “An additional bidder on a project was associated with 8.3% lower costs, approximately $460,000 for the average project.”

What They Discuss:

  • U.S. infrastructure costs three times as much on a per-mile basis compared to other upper- and middle-income countries.
  • State DOTs report severe understaffing and an over-reliance on consultants, leading to higher costs; a one standard deviation increase in consultant use is associated with 20% higher costs per lane-mile.
  • A lack of competition in the bidding process for government construction contracts further increases costs; enhancing bidder outreach can reduce costs by 17.6%.
  • The performance of individual engineers significantly impacts project costs; replacing a high-cost engineer with a median-cost engineer can reduce costs by 5.3% per mile.
  • Better planning and providing more bid details are associated with lower costs, while frequent change orders due to poor planning lead to higher expenditures.

What They Recommend:

  • Increase the staffing capacity of state DOTs to reduce reliance on costly consultants.
  • Enhance outreach efforts to potential bidders to increase competition and lower costs.
  • Focus on better planning and providing detailed project information to minimize costly change orders.
  • Invest in training and capacity-building for state engineers to ensure more consistent and efficient project management.

Key Takeaways:

  • High U.S. infrastructure costs can be mitigated by strengthening state DOT capacities and encouraging competitive bidding.
  • Proper planning and detailed bidding information can significantly reduce project costs.
  • Addressing staffing and competitive challenges can lead to substantial cost savings on infrastructure projects.

This is a brief overview of the article by Comfort Oshagbemi and David Wessel at Brookings. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Trump’s Disqualification: A Primer
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump’s Disqualification: A Primer

Summary

Cato Institute expert Robert A. Levy writes that U.S. SupremeCourt Chief Justice Roberts will be "concerned about political repercussions" if Trump is disqualified from running.

Levy also argues that liberal justices will likely lean toward allowing voting citizens to decide if Trump should be President.

Libertarian
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The Consequences of China’s New Rare Earths Export Restrictions
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

The Consequences of China’s New Rare Earths Export Restrictions

Summary

New export restrictions imposed by China on rare earth elements have significant implications for U.S. sourcing of these critical materials, particularly for defense technologies. The restrictions require licenses for exports, potentially disrupting supply chains and impacting U.S. firms, especially in the defense sector, per commentary from Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Centrist
Article
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump 2.0: A Survival Guide for Democrats
American Enterprise Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump 2.0: A Survival Guide for Democrats

Summary

The Democratic Party is currently facing significant challenges in regaining favor after recent electoral losses, as only 33 percent of Americans view the party positively. The party's struggle to adapt and connect with voters indicates a pressing need for strategic changes to compete effectively in future elections, per commentary from American Enterprise Institute.

Center Right
Op-Ed
·
Artificial Intelligence
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
President Trump’s Tariff Formula Makes No Economic Sense. It’s Also Based on an Error.
American Enterprise Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

President Trump’s Tariff Formula Makes No Economic Sense. It’s Also Based on an Error.

Summary

President Trump’s latest tariff plan is under fire from a conservative think tank, which says the math behind it is both flawed and misleading. The American Enterprise Institute (AEI) warns that the formula used by the White House drastically overstates the trade barriers imposed by foreign countries — and risks harming the U.S. economy.

Conservative
Commentary
·
U.S. Economy
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The Art of a Good Deal: Ukraine’s Strategic Economic Opportunity for the United States
Council on Foreign Relations
·
Nov 18, 2023

The Art of a Good Deal: Ukraine’s Strategic Economic Opportunity for the United States

Summary

Ukraine presents a strategic economic opportunity for the United States, particularly as the nation is rich in critical minerals and advanced technology sectors. Investing in Ukraine not only enhances economic ties but also fortifies U.S. national security interests amid geopolitical tensions, per commentary from Council on Foreign Relations.

Center
Commentary
·
Ukraine-Russia War
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.