Summary

  • Brendan Duke at Center for American Progress argues that Project 2025 proposes a tax plan that raises taxes on low- and middle-income families while giving significant tax cuts to the wealthy and corporations.
  • The analysis asserts that the introduction of a flat consumption tax and elimination of income taxes would result in higher costs for middle- and low-income households, shifting the tax burden away from wealthy individuals and large corporations.

Overview:  

This article was written by Brendan Duke at Center for American Progress.  

  • The article discusses how Project 2025's tax reform plans would significantly raise taxes on low- and middle-income households while providing substantial tax cuts for the wealthy.
  • The proposed tax changes would shift the burden from wealthy individuals and corporations to the middle class and poorer Americans, exacerbating income inequality.

Key Quotes:

  1. "This is because the two current bottom brackets (10 percent and 12 percent) are lower than the 15 percent tax bracket proposed by Project 2025."
  2. "The required roughly 45 percent VAT is a lower bound..."

What They Discuss:

  • The "intermediate tax reform" proposed by Project 2025 includes consolidating existing tax brackets to two brackets (15 percent and 30 percent), which would result in a $3,000 tax increase for the median family of four and a $950 increase for a typical single-person household.
  • The wealthiest 45,000 U.S. households would receive an average tax cut of $1.5–2.4 million due to the plan's restructuring and cuts to taxes on investment income.
  • Project 2025 aims to reduce the corporate tax rate from 21 percent to 18 percent, resulting in a $24 billion tax cut for America’s top 100 corporations.
  • The long-term plan includes replacing all individual and corporate income taxes with a consumption tax, potentially leading to a 45 percent national sales tax, which would cause a significant rise in prices and inflation.
  • The proposed tax changes would disproportionately impact middle-income households, increasing their average tax burden by $5,900, while the top 0.1 percent would see an average tax cut of $2 million.

What They Recommend:

  • Brendan Duke recommends a thorough evaluation of Project 2025 to understand its potential impacts on different income groups.
  • Policymakers should consider the regressive nature of shifting to a consumption tax and its long-term effects on economic inequality.
  • It’s implied that more progressive tax reforms, which include protections and deductions for low- and middle-income families, should be explored instead.

Key Takeaways:

  • Project 2025’s tax reform plans would lead to significant tax increases for middle-income households and substantial tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans and corporations.
  • The proposed consumption tax, replacing current income taxes, could result in steep price increases and inflation, disproportionately affecting low- and middle-income families.
  • These tax reforms could exacerbate economic inequality in the U.S. by shifting the tax burden from the rich to the poorer segments of society.

This is a brief overview of the article by Brendan Duke at Center for American Progress. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
The Need for Supreme Court Term Limits
Center for American Progress
·
Nov 18, 2023

The Need for Supreme Court Term Limits

Summary
  • Maggie Jo Buchanan points out that the average tenure of Supreme Court justices has significantly increased, leading to a lack of regularity in vacancies and a more politically charged confirmation process.
  • Implementing an 18-year nonrenewable term limit for Supreme Court justices could help better reflect the broader public and reduce the politicization of the court.
Progressive
Report
·
U.S. Government & Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Israel-Hamas Conflict: 5 Actions Washington Should Prioritize Now
Center for American Progress
·
Nov 18, 2023

Israel-Hamas Conflict: 5 Actions Washington Should Prioritize Now

Summary
  • The U.S. should prioritize negotiating a humanitarian ceasefire in the Israel-Hamas conflict and ensure robust humanitarian aid to Gaza, while supporting Israel's defense needs without contributing to collective punishment against Palestinians.
  • It's important for the U.S. to enforce policies on civilian protection and human rights in the conflict, and to lead diplomatic efforts for a political solution that fosters lasting peace between Israelis and Palestinians.
Progressive
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Colleges’ Inexcusable Cowardice on Hamas
American Enterprise Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Colleges’ Inexcusable Cowardice on Hamas

Summary
  • AEI expert Samuel J. Abrams argues that the silence or delayed response of college administrations in the face of Hamas's attacks is a moral failure and indicative of a broader issue of anti-Semitism on campuses.
  • Abrams writes that colleges and universities should swiftly condemn actions taken by Hamas against innocent Israelis, and administrators and presidents who fail to confront these issues should step down.
Conservative
Blog
·
Education
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
What China’s Ban on Rare Earths Processing Technology Exports Means
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

What China’s Ban on Rare Earths Processing Technology Exports Means

Summary
  • China's decision to ban the export of rare minerals affects U.S. national, economic, and rare earth security, given that rare earth elements are crucial in defense and technology sectors.
  • The U.S. has and should expedite its efforts to address its vulnerability in this area through funding decisions to enhance domestic rare earth processing capabilities.
Leans Right
Commentary
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The Painful Lesson: Defense Is Not Enough
Hudson Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

The Painful Lesson: Defense Is Not Enough

Summary
  • Hudson scholar John P. Walters writes that the October 7 attacks in Israel by Hamas showcases the need for a more proactive approach to deterrence beyond passive defense strategies.
  • Walters criticizes U.S. policy towards Israel, suggesting it has encouraged a passive defense approach and hindered proactive deterrence.
Conservative
Report
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.