Summary

  • Brendan Duke at Center for American Progress argues that Project 2025 proposes a tax plan that raises taxes on low- and middle-income families while giving significant tax cuts to the wealthy and corporations.
  • The analysis asserts that the introduction of a flat consumption tax and elimination of income taxes would result in higher costs for middle- and low-income households, shifting the tax burden away from wealthy individuals and large corporations.

Overview:  

This article was written by Brendan Duke at Center for American Progress.  

  • The article discusses how Project 2025's tax reform plans would significantly raise taxes on low- and middle-income households while providing substantial tax cuts for the wealthy.
  • The proposed tax changes would shift the burden from wealthy individuals and corporations to the middle class and poorer Americans, exacerbating income inequality.

Key Quotes:

  1. "This is because the two current bottom brackets (10 percent and 12 percent) are lower than the 15 percent tax bracket proposed by Project 2025."
  2. "The required roughly 45 percent VAT is a lower bound..."

What They Discuss:

  • The "intermediate tax reform" proposed by Project 2025 includes consolidating existing tax brackets to two brackets (15 percent and 30 percent), which would result in a $3,000 tax increase for the median family of four and a $950 increase for a typical single-person household.
  • The wealthiest 45,000 U.S. households would receive an average tax cut of $1.5–2.4 million due to the plan's restructuring and cuts to taxes on investment income.
  • Project 2025 aims to reduce the corporate tax rate from 21 percent to 18 percent, resulting in a $24 billion tax cut for America’s top 100 corporations.
  • The long-term plan includes replacing all individual and corporate income taxes with a consumption tax, potentially leading to a 45 percent national sales tax, which would cause a significant rise in prices and inflation.
  • The proposed tax changes would disproportionately impact middle-income households, increasing their average tax burden by $5,900, while the top 0.1 percent would see an average tax cut of $2 million.

What They Recommend:

  • Brendan Duke recommends a thorough evaluation of Project 2025 to understand its potential impacts on different income groups.
  • Policymakers should consider the regressive nature of shifting to a consumption tax and its long-term effects on economic inequality.
  • It’s implied that more progressive tax reforms, which include protections and deductions for low- and middle-income families, should be explored instead.

Key Takeaways:

  • Project 2025’s tax reform plans would lead to significant tax increases for middle-income households and substantial tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans and corporations.
  • The proposed consumption tax, replacing current income taxes, could result in steep price increases and inflation, disproportionately affecting low- and middle-income families.
  • These tax reforms could exacerbate economic inequality in the U.S. by shifting the tax burden from the rich to the poorer segments of society.

This is a brief overview of the article by Brendan Duke at Center for American Progress. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
The Gaza War Has Convinced Russia It Was Right All Along
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
·
Nov 18, 2023

The Gaza War Has Convinced Russia It Was Right All Along

Summary
  • Carnegie Endowment expert Nikita Smagin writes that the Gaza conflict has reinforced Russia's belief in the correctness of its foreign policy approach, particularly in relation to the Western-centric international system.
  • Russia views the conflict as an opportunity to further its geopolitical interests, especially amidst the ongoing war in Ukraine.
Liberal
Commentary
·
Ukraine-Russia War
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The generative world order: AI, geopolitics, and power
Goldman Sachs Global Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

The generative world order: AI, geopolitics, and power

Summary
  • Goldman Sachs Global Institute estimates AI could contribute 1.5% to annual productivity growth over a ten-year period, lifting global GDP by nearly $7 trillion.
  • U.S. and China are top AI competitors, but geopolitical swing states like India, Japan, Israel, UAE, and South Korea can form "innovation blocs" and cooperate with each other.
Private Sector
Research
·
Artificial Intelligence
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
On Hezbollah, Lebanon, and the risk of escalation
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

On Hezbollah, Lebanon, and the risk of escalation

Summary
  • Hezbollah is a politically-powerful force within Lebanon, and now serves as Iran's equal partner and "most successful and lethal export".
  • While Hezbollah and Hamas are on opposite sides of the Shia-Sunni divide, both groups find common ground under Iranian support and being anti-Israeli, anti-American, and anti-Western.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
U.S.-China Competition and Military AI: How Washington Can Manage Strategic Risks amid Rivalry with Beijing
Center for a New American Security
·
Nov 18, 2023

U.S.-China Competition and Military AI: How Washington Can Manage Strategic Risks amid Rivalry with Beijing

Summary
  • This report highlights the intersection of growing U.S.-China geopolitical rivalry and the rapid development of military AI and how the U.S. can manage strategic risks.
  • It discusses China's integration of AI into its military and civilian sectors, proposes ways for the U.S. to limit China's military AI progress.
Center Left
Report
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump’s Disqualification: A Primer
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump’s Disqualification: A Primer

Summary
  • Cato Institute expert Robert A. Levy writes that U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts will be "concerned about political repercussions" if Trump is disqualified from running.
  • Levy also argues that liberal justices will likely lean toward allowing voting citizens to decide if Trump should be President.
Libertarian
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.