American Enterprise Institute
·
Published
July 16, 2024
Share this article

Summary

  • Adam Kissel at American Enterprise Institute argues that public universities suffer from a culture of timidity in discussing conservative ideas and that privatizing these institutions could introduce market discipline, potentially saving states billions in subsidies.
  • The article advocates for states to wait until interest rates drop below 4 percent before attempting to privatize universities through an endowment/bond plan, suggesting this transition will lead to institutions better aligned with market needs and free from bureaucratic constraints.

Overview:

This article was written by Adam Kissel at American Enterprise Institute. 

  • Public universities in the U.S. often avoid sharing ideas outside the prevailing academic norms.
  • Interest rates should drop below 4 percent before states pursue university privatization through an endowment/bond plan.

Key Quotes:

  • "Public universities suffer from demonstrated cultures of timidity when it comes to sharing ideas that stand to the right of the prevailing academic regime."
  • "States seeking to privatize their universities through an endowment/bond plan should wait for interest rates to return below 4 percent."

What They Discuss:

  • Public universities demonstrate a noticeable reluctance to entertain conservative ideas, contributing to a perceived culture of speech suppression.
  • Privatizing public universities is proposed as a solution, potentially saving states like Texas nearly $14 billion annually.
  • One privatization approach involves gradually reducing state funding to zero while giving colleges ownership of their land.
  • Alternatively, states could use an endowment/bond plan that maintains revenue neutrality by appropriating funds equivalent to eighteen to twenty times the average funding from the past five years.
  • Fairmont State University serves as a case study, highlighting issues like low graduation rates and high drop-out rates despite significant state subsidies.

What They Recommend:

  • States should consider privatizing public colleges either gradually or through an endowment/bond plan.
  • State legislatures should wait until interest rates fall below 4 percent before adopting the endowment/bond approach.
  • Resources should be redirected towards students most likely to succeed rather than continuing blanket subsidies for institutions.
  • States could reallocate savings from privatization to other public needs or reduce taxpayer burdens.

Key Takeaways:

  • Privatization could address cultural and financial inefficiencies in public universities.
  • Approaches to privatization include reducing state funding gradually or using a revenue-neutral endowment plan.
  • Privatizing universities could improve the intellectual climate and financial accountability in higher education.
  • States could save billions in subsidies by privatizing public institutions and should wait for favorable interest rates to proceed.

This is a brief overview of the article by Adam Kissel at American Enterprise Institute. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
What China’s Ban on Rare Earths Processing Technology Exports Means
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

What China’s Ban on Rare Earths Processing Technology Exports Means

Summary
  • China's decision to ban the export of rare minerals affects U.S. national, economic, and rare earth security, given that rare earth elements are crucial in defense and technology sectors.
  • The U.S. has and should expedite its efforts to address its vulnerability in this area through funding decisions to enhance domestic rare earth processing capabilities.
Centrist
Commentary
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Someone Has to Lead
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Someone Has to Lead

Summary
  • The U.S. must keep leading the world in promoting global human rights, despite its flawed human rights record and internal struggles.
  • Progress on freedom in the world requires U.S. leadership, otherwise Russia, China, and other autocratic states will continue democratic backsliding around the world.
Centrist
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Advancing U.S.-China Coordination amid Strategic Competition: An Emerging Playbook
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Advancing U.S.-China Coordination amid Strategic Competition: An Emerging Playbook

Summary

The U.S.-China relationship currently faces significant rivalry that impacts collaboration, yet history shows that even rivals can work together on shared challenges. Understanding and advancing methods for cooperation among nonstate actors will be critical for addressing major global issues, per commentary from Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Centrist
Issue Brief
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Gaza’s Human Crisis Demands a Rethink
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Gaza’s Human Crisis Demands a Rethink

Summary
  • CSIS Global Health Policy experts write that the Biden administration must reset its strategy to manage Israel's conduct in the conflict, which has caused an "apocalyptic" humanitarian crisis and global reputational damage.
  • Gaza's entire health system has been destroyed, with UN agencies and NGOs struggling to provide minimum medical aid to Gazan refugees.
Centrist
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Can Maduro Pull off the Mother of All Electoral Frauds?
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Can Maduro Pull off the Mother of All Electoral Frauds?

Summary
  • Ryan C. Berg and Christopher Hernandez-Roy at Center for Strategic and International Studies analyze that Venezuela's recent elections showcased a blatant electoral theft by President Maduro, who manipulated election conditions, barred opposition candidates, and used repression to secure a disputed victory over Edmundo González.

  • The article asserts that the Maduro regime’s fraudulent actions, including blocking international observations and harassing opposition supporters, risk severe international isolation and a possible constitutional crisis if vote tabulations are not transparently released, undermining any claims to democratic legitimacy.
Centrist
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.