Summary

Trump's threatened tariffs could lead to significant economic harm for the U.S., Canada, Mexico, and China. These tariffs, if implemented, threaten to slow economic growth and increase inflation across all involved nations, per commentary from Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Trump's proposed tariffs on Mexico, Canada, and China could harm all involved economies, including the US. These measures aim to tackle illegal immigration and drug flows, according to a commentary by experts at Peterson Institute for International Economics.

The issue:  

Trump intends to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and a 10% tariff on China to address illegal immigration and fentanyl trafficking. These tariffs threaten to disrupt highly integrated economies, potentially reducing US GDP by $200 billion and significantly slowing growth in all affected countries.

What they recommend:  

Experts advise renegotiating the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) to avoid the economic damage from imposing tariffs. They suggest making concessions within the agreement to address US concerns and prevent the need for tariff imposition.

Go deeper:  

The analysis utilizes the G-Cubed model to project extensive GDP losses and increased inflation across the US, Mexico, Canada, and China if the tariffs are implemented. Mexico, heavily reliant on US exports, faces catastrophic economic impacts, potentially exacerbating illegal immigration incentives. Historical patterns indicate that Trump may not follow through on his tariff threats, as seen during his previous administration.

This is a brief overview of the commentary by experts at Peterson Institute for International Economics. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full commentary.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
How the prospect of a second Trump presidency is already shaping geopolitics
Atlantic Council
·
Nov 18, 2023

How the prospect of a second Trump presidency is already shaping geopolitics

Summary
  • The potential return of Donald Trump as President is influencing foreign governments' policy decisions, with some delaying actions in hope of better negotiations and others preparing for less favorable outcomes.
  • The uncertainty surrounding US foreign policy under a potential Trump administration is causing both allies and adversaries to adjust their strategies far ahead of the US elections.
Leans Right
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
How President Biden is appeasing bad actors
Texas Public Policy Foundation
·
Nov 18, 2023

How President Biden is appeasing bad actors

Summary
  • The Biden administration's appeasement of authoritarian regimes in South America have not stopped the outflow of refugees and migrants trying to enter the U.S.
  • Lifting previous oil & gas sanctions on the Maduro regime in exchange for free elections have not worked, with Venezuelans now the fastest-growing immigrant group in the U.S.
Conservative
Commentary
·
Immigration
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Should the US pursue a new Cold War with China?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Should the US pursue a new Cold War with China?

Summary
  • Brookings experts debate the applicability of the Cold War analogy to the current U.S.-China relationship, considering the economic, political, and military dimensions.
  • While the U.S. and China are in a state of competition, it differs fundamentally from the U.S.-Soviet Cold War, particularly due to economic interdependence. China's rise and its political model present unique challenges, but it does not seek to overthrow democratic regimes or force its political model on others.
Leans Left
Research
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Don’t Hold Up Israel Aid to Further Ukraine War Funding
Heritage Foundation
·
Nov 18, 2023

Don’t Hold Up Israel Aid to Further Ukraine War Funding

Summary
  • Heritage Foundation scholars emphasize that the U.S. should not compromise its support for Israel, a key ally in the Middle East, in favor of additional funding for Ukraine.
  • The commentary highlights the distinct nature of the conflicts in Ukraine and Israel and the need for separate responses.
Conservative
Commentary
·
Ukraine-Russia War
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Extremist Israeli settlers are nonstate armed actors
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Extremist Israeli settlers are nonstate armed actors

Summary
  • Brookings expert Jeffrey Feltman discuss the escalating violence by extremist Israeli settlers against Palestinian civilians in the West Bank and the implications for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
  • He argues that these Israeli settlers should be considered nonstate armed actors (NSAA) and suggests that the U.S. should take stronger actions against them, similar to measures used against Palestinian terrorism.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.