Cato Institute
·
Published
July 11, 2024

Trump v. US: With Great Power Comes Great Immunity

Libertarian
Commentary
·
U.S. Government & Politics
Share this article

Summary

  • Gene Healy at Cato Institute argues that Chief Justice John Roberts' ruling in Trump v. United States introduces broad presidential immunities, raising concerns about unchecked executive power and "legislating from the bench."
  • The article asserts that these new immunities could pave the way for presidential recklessness, with critics like Healy and Justice Sonia Sotomayor highlighting the lack of constitutional basis and potential abuse of power by future presidents.

Overview:

This article was written by Gene Healy at Cato Institute.

  • Healy examines Chief Justice John Roberts' justification for granting broad criminal-process immunities to the president in the Trump v. United States case.
  • Healy critiques these new immunities, arguing they pose greater risks due to potential presidential recklessness and are based on creative, and questionable, constitutional interpretation.

Key Quotes:

  • "Chief Justice John Roberts insists that it is. In fact, the self-styled judicial 'umpire' considers the specter of presidential risk aversion grave enough to justify rewriting the rules of the game."
  • "The analysis therefore must be fact specific, Roberts concludes, and may prove to be challenging."

What They Discuss:

  • The article outlines how the new immunities protect the president by creating multiple layers of shielding from criminal prosecution for a wide range of actions.
  • Roberts' opinion heavily relies on the idea that the president's role in American life and law is unique, which justifies broad immunities.
  • Justice Sonia Sotomayor's dissent points out that these immunities are not supported by the constitutional text, highlighting that the Framers knew how to give specific protections but did not do so for the presidency.
  • Sai Prakash’s academic work is referenced to support the argument that no historical precedent or constitutional text grants the president such wide-ranging immunities.
  • The potential for prosecutorial action against Trump and the implications of such immunities given his vows to prosecute political opponents are also discussed.

What They Recommend:

  • Healy suggests that instead of the Court creating immunities, Congress should use its legislative powers to craft specific, targeted immunities if deemed necessary.
  • He advocates for statutory solutions over constitutionally grounded immunities as they can be more easily modified or repealed by Congress.
  • There is an implicit recommendation to avoid judicial overreach and maintain a clear separation of powers by sticking closely to the constitutional text.

Key Takeaways:

  • The new presidential immunities are seen as dangerous because they could encourage presidential misconduct and are not clearly derived from constitutional text.
  • Justice Roberts' majority opinion is characterized as a form of judicial overreach, rewriting constitutional rules without historical or textual backing.
  • Sai Prakash's work reinforces that the broad immunities claimed by Roberts lack historical and textual foundation, contradicting the originalist interpretation of the Constitution.
  • Prakash suggests that any needed immunities should come from legislative actions by Congress, not judicial inventions.
  • The ruling could potentially allow presidents to act recklessly without fear of criminal prosecution, raising concerns about accountability and the rule of law.

This is a brief overview of the article by Gene Healy at Cato Institute. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Trump 2.0: A Survival Guide for Democrats
American Enterprise Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump 2.0: A Survival Guide for Democrats

Summary

The Democratic Party is currently facing significant challenges in regaining favor after recent electoral losses, as only 33 percent of Americans view the party positively. The party's struggle to adapt and connect with voters indicates a pressing need for strategic changes to compete effectively in future elections, per commentary from American Enterprise Institute.

Conservative
Op-Ed
·
U.S. Government & Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
How federal layoffs set the stage for greater privatization and automation of the US government
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

How federal layoffs set the stage for greater privatization and automation of the US government

Summary

The federal government's effort to downsize may lead to increased privatization and automation. This shift raises concerns about the accessibility and fairness of services for Americans reliant on government support, per commentary from Brookings.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
U.S. Government & Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Domestic Deployment of the Military: The Past, Present, and Potential Future
Center for American Progress
·
Nov 18, 2023

Domestic Deployment of the Military: The Past, Present, and Potential Future

Summary

In exploring how military deployment could shape domestic governance, recent discussions highlight potential risks under the Trump administration. The report indicates that such actions, unless carefully monitored, could undermine constitutional safeguards and public safety, per commentary from Center for American Progress.

Progressive
Report
·
U.S. Military & Defense
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The Art of a Good Deal: Ukraine’s Strategic Economic Opportunity for the United States
Council on Foreign Relations
·
Nov 18, 2023

The Art of a Good Deal: Ukraine’s Strategic Economic Opportunity for the United States

Summary

Ukraine presents a strategic economic opportunity for the United States, particularly as the nation is rich in critical minerals and advanced technology sectors. Investing in Ukraine not only enhances economic ties but also fortifies U.S. national security interests amid geopolitical tensions, per commentary from Council on Foreign Relations.

Center
Commentary
·
Ukraine-Russia War
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Tariffs on Canada and Mexico could hurt Trump’s quest for US energy dominance
Atlantic Council
·
Nov 18, 2023

Tariffs on Canada and Mexico could hurt Trump’s quest for US energy dominance

Summary

Tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico could significantly undermine U.S. energy dominance by raising domestic energy prices and disrupting critical supply chains. These actions may drive U.S. trading partners to seek alternatives, diminishing American competitiveness in energy exports, per commentary from Atlantic Council.

Leans Right
Commentary
·
Global Economy
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.