Brookings
·
Published
July 8, 2024

With AI, we need both competition and safety

Leans Left
Commentary
·
Artificial Intelligence
Share this article

Summary

  • Tom Wheeler and Blair Levin at Brookings argue that the FTC and DOJ should investigate AI collaborations and transactions for antitrust concerns while simultaneously encouraging AI safety standards through industry cooperation.
  • They propose a model that balances competition and AI safety, advocating supervised processes, market incentives, and regulatory oversight to ensure AI companies collaborate on safety without undermining competitive markets.

Overview:  

This article was written by Tom Wheeler and Blair Levin at Brookings.

  • The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Department of Justice (DOJ) are investigating AI collaborations for potential antitrust violations due to concerns over market concentration and competition.
  • AI safety should be a priority alongside competition, suggesting collaborations to set safety standards without disincentivizing competitive practices.

Key Quotes:

  • "Building the AI future around competition and safety should be a no-brainer."
  • "AI may be new, but the responsibilities of AI companies to protect their users have been around for literally hundreds of years."

What They Discuss:

  • The potential of AI to surpass human cognitive abilities in the near future and the consequent risks involved.
  • The importance of creating uniformly applicable safety standards to prevent a "race to the bottom."
  • Examples of effective industry-government collaborations, such as the American Medical Association's standards for doctors and the FINRA’s regulations in the financial industry.
  • The necessity for transparency and ongoing oversight in ensuring AI safety standards.
  • Historical precedents like the Cybersecurity Social Contract, which balanced collaboration and compliance with antitrust laws.

What They Recommend:

  • Encourage collaboration between AI companies to establish and adhere to AI safety standards.
  • Develop a model that evolves as technology advances and incentivizes companies to exceed baseline safety standards.
  • Ensure transparency and oversight to enforce compliance and protect public welfare.
  • Draw lessons from successful industry-government collaborations to create enforceable AI safety standards.
  • Clarify government policy to support AI safety collaborations without impeding competition through an executive order or joint FTC/DOJ statement.

Key Takeaways:

  • AI development must balance safety and competition to protect public interests while fostering innovation.
  • Collaboration on AI safety is necessary and can coexist with competitive practices, as evidenced by historical regulatory examples.
  • The government needs to adopt a supervisory rather than a dictatorial role in enforcing AI safety standards.
  • Clear policies and collaborative frameworks are essential to achieve safe and competitive AI markets.

This is a brief overview of the article by Tom Wheeler and Blair Levin at Brookings. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
What China’s Ban on Rare Earths Processing Technology Exports Means
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

What China’s Ban on Rare Earths Processing Technology Exports Means

Summary
  • China's decision to ban the export of rare minerals affects U.S. national, economic, and rare earth security, given that rare earth elements are crucial in defense and technology sectors.
  • The U.S. has and should expedite its efforts to address its vulnerability in this area through funding decisions to enhance domestic rare earth processing capabilities.
Centrist
Commentary
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Someone Has to Lead
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Someone Has to Lead

Summary
  • The U.S. must keep leading the world in promoting global human rights, despite its flawed human rights record and internal struggles.
  • Progress on freedom in the world requires U.S. leadership, otherwise Russia, China, and other autocratic states will continue democratic backsliding around the world.
Centrist
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Advancing U.S.-China Coordination amid Strategic Competition: An Emerging Playbook
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Advancing U.S.-China Coordination amid Strategic Competition: An Emerging Playbook

Summary

The U.S.-China relationship currently faces significant rivalry that impacts collaboration, yet history shows that even rivals can work together on shared challenges. Understanding and advancing methods for cooperation among nonstate actors will be critical for addressing major global issues, per commentary from Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Centrist
Issue Brief
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Gaza’s Human Crisis Demands a Rethink
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Gaza’s Human Crisis Demands a Rethink

Summary
  • CSIS Global Health Policy experts write that the Biden administration must reset its strategy to manage Israel's conduct in the conflict, which has caused an "apocalyptic" humanitarian crisis and global reputational damage.
  • Gaza's entire health system has been destroyed, with UN agencies and NGOs struggling to provide minimum medical aid to Gazan refugees.
Centrist
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Can Maduro Pull off the Mother of All Electoral Frauds?
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Can Maduro Pull off the Mother of All Electoral Frauds?

Summary
  • Ryan C. Berg and Christopher Hernandez-Roy at Center for Strategic and International Studies analyze that Venezuela's recent elections showcased a blatant electoral theft by President Maduro, who manipulated election conditions, barred opposition candidates, and used repression to secure a disputed victory over Edmundo González.

  • The article asserts that the Maduro regime’s fraudulent actions, including blocking international observations and harassing opposition supporters, risk severe international isolation and a possible constitutional crisis if vote tabulations are not transparently released, undermining any claims to democratic legitimacy.
Centrist
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.