Heritage Foundation
·
Published
September 4, 2024

Bring Back Trump’s China Policy

Conservative
Commentary
·
U.S.-China Relations
Share this article

Summary

  • Bryan Burack at Heritage Foundation writes that the Trump administration's significant foreign policy legacy was its strategic response to China's economic warfare against the U.S., emphasizing the importance of maintaining these measures for deterrence.
  • The article asserts that the Biden administration has adopted a less assertive approach, reviving engagement policies with China due to concerns that aggressive economic protections might provoke conflict, which has led to counterproductive security tradeoffs.

Overview:  

This article was written by Bryan Burack at the Heritage Foundation.

  • The Trump administration's significant foreign policy legacy is its proactive response to China's economic strategies against the United States.
  • The Biden administration, although continuing some of Trump's economic and tech policies toward China, has softened its overall approach due to concerns about perceived provocations.

Key Quotes:  

  • "The Trump administration’s most important foreign policy legacy is its much-needed response to China’s economic warfare against the United States."
  • "The Biden administration has watered down its overall approach due to fears that aggressively protecting the U.S. economy may be too provocative."

What They Discuss:  

  • The contrasting approaches of the Trump and Biden administrations regarding U.S. economic policies towards China, with the former adopting a more antagonistic stance and the latter emphasizing engagement.
  • Even while continuing some policies, the Biden administration has taken actions to reassure China, which some view as weakening the U.S. position.
  • Concerns from both political spectrums that rigorous economic measures could provoke China into conflict if enforced without a strong military position.
  • Arguments against the belief that the U.S. is "strangling" China's economy, pointing out that both nations remain heavily interdependent economically.
  • The inevitability of decoupling in critical economic sectors as pushed by the Chinese government itself, which has been preparing to become more self-reliant.

What They Recommend:  

  • Maintain and continue the economic and technological measures initiated by the Trump administration to reduce dependencies on China.
  • Strengthen America’s defense industrial base and address supply chain vulnerabilities to ensure credible military deterrence.
  • Acknowledge and prepare for the inevitability of some form of economic decoupling from China, acting from a position of strength.

Key Takeaways:  

  • The U.S. should continue efforts to reduce reliance on China to maintain national security and economic stability.
  • Assertive economic policies are essential to deter Chinese aggression effectively.
  • The current U.S.-China relationship dynamic is not akin to the pre-WWII U.S.-Japan scenario in terms of economic measures.
  • Decoupling in sensitive sectors is perceived as inevitable and is being actively pursued by China's own policy goals.
  • Ensuring America's economic security will make the country more resilient and better positioned to counter China's growing influence.

This is a brief overview of the article by Bryan Burack at Heritage Foundation. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Why Is It So Hard for China to Boost Domestic Demand?
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
·
Nov 18, 2023

Why Is It So Hard for China to Boost Domestic Demand?

Summary
  • Experts at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace argue that China's Third Plenum communiqué remains vague on demand-side measures, even though boosting consumption is widely seen as crucial for sustainable growth.

  • The analysis suggests that despite consensus on the need for stronger consumer demand, Beijing faces challenges in shifting from an investment-driven economy due to long-standing transfers that benefit manufacturing, infrastructure, and local governments at the expense of households.
Liberal
Commentary
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
A Cosmopolitan Case against World Government
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

A Cosmopolitan Case against World Government

Summary
  • Ilya Somin at Cato Institute argues that supporting globalization and opposing world government are not contradictory positions because a world government could worsen voter ignorance, hinder foot voting, and potentially spiral into catastrophic authoritarianism.
  • The article asserts that world government is unnecessary for solving global issues and could suppress beneficial diversity and competition between nations. Instead, voluntary cooperation among major powers can address international challenges effectively.
Libertarian
Report
·
U.S. Government & Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Project 2025 Compels Local Prosecutors To Enforce Extreme Right-Wing Laws
Center for American Progress
·
Nov 18, 2023

Project 2025 Compels Local Prosecutors To Enforce Extreme Right-Wing Laws

Summary
  • Lindsey McLendon at Center for American Progress argues that Project 2025 aims to dismantle the U.S. system of checks and balances, granting politicians, judges, and corporations increased control over Americans' lives by enforcing extreme right-wing policies through the U.S. Department of Justice.
  • The Center for American Progress asserts that Project 2025 would pressure local district attorneys to enforce severe abortion bans and other restrictive laws, exacerbating the maternal health crisis and reducing access to essential reproductive healthcare, particularly in states with already high maternal mortality rates.
Progressive
Article
·
U.S. Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump chose Vance to reinforce his message
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump chose Vance to reinforce his message

Summary
  • Elaine Kamarck at Brookings writes that in selecting Senator J.D. Vance as his running mate, Donald Trump aimed to solidify his hard-right agenda, emphasizing Vance's alignment with Trump's core messages and MAGA base.
  • The article examines how Trump's choice of Vance follows the "reinforcing model" of vice-presidential selection, where the VP candidate strengthens the presidential candidate's message and governance, rather than providing a traditional ideological or geographic balance.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Putting Public Colleges on a Path to Privatization
American Enterprise Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Putting Public Colleges on a Path to Privatization

Summary
  • Adam Kissel at American Enterprise Institute argues that public universities suffer from a culture of timidity in discussing conservative ideas and that privatizing these institutions could introduce market discipline, potentially saving states billions in subsidies.
  • The article advocates for states to wait until interest rates drop below 4 percent before attempting to privatize universities through an endowment/bond plan, suggesting this transition will lead to institutions better aligned with market needs and free from bureaucratic constraints.
Conservative
Commentary
·
Education
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.