American Enterprise Institute
·
Published
January 18, 2024

Democracy v. the Constitution in the Trump Case

Conservative
Blog
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Share this article

Summary

  • AEI scholar Peter J. Wallison writes that the Trump case highlights the delicate balance between democracy and constitutional safeguards in the United States.
  • The decision of the Supreme Court in this case could have significant implications for the interpretation of constitutional democracy, as well as the importance of public awareness and understanding of constitutional issues in democratic societies.

Overview:

  • This article by Peter J. Wallison at American Enterprise Institute discusses the Supreme Court's decision to hear Donald Trump's appeal regarding his eligibility to become President again under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
  • The case presents a conflict between Trump's public support and the constitutional language.
  • The article explores the tension between democracy and constitutional limits in the context of Trump's actions after the 2020 election.

Key Quotes:

  1. "The United States is a constitutional democracy; the people have the right to vote for their leaders, but only within rules set by the Constitution."
  2. "The mere fact that Trump believes he has the power he claimed makes him a menace to all as President."

What They Discuss:

  • The constitutional debate over Trump's eligibility for the presidency based on his actions after the 2020 election.
  • The role of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment in disqualifying individuals who have broken their oath to support the Constitution.
  • Trump's alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election results and the implications for his eligibility.
  • The broader implications of Trump's actions for the principles of constitutional democracy in the United States.
  • The lack of public awareness about the specifics of Trump's actions and the role of the media in this context.

What They Recommend:

  • The article suggests a need for careful consideration of constitutional principles in deciding Trump's eligibility for a second term.
  • It emphasizes the importance of upholding the Constitution over popular support in democratic governance.

Key Takeaways:

  • The Trump case highlights the delicate balance between democracy and constitutional safeguards in the United States.
  • The decision of the Supreme Court in this case could have significant implications for the interpretation of constitutional democracy.
  • The article underscores the importance of public awareness and understanding of constitutional issues in democratic societies.​

This is a brief overview of Peter J. Wallison's work from the American Enterprise Institute. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Can Maduro Pull off the Mother of All Electoral Frauds?
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Can Maduro Pull off the Mother of All Electoral Frauds?

Summary
  • Ryan C. Berg and Christopher Hernandez-Roy at Center for Strategic and International Studies analyze that Venezuela's recent elections showcased a blatant electoral theft by President Maduro, who manipulated election conditions, barred opposition candidates, and used repression to secure a disputed victory over Edmundo González.

  • The article asserts that the Maduro regime’s fraudulent actions, including blocking international observations and harassing opposition supporters, risk severe international isolation and a possible constitutional crisis if vote tabulations are not transparently released, undermining any claims to democratic legitimacy.
Leans Right
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Why Is It So Hard for China to Boost Domestic Demand?
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
·
Nov 18, 2023

Why Is It So Hard for China to Boost Domestic Demand?

Summary
  • Experts at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace argue that China's Third Plenum communiqué remains vague on demand-side measures, even though boosting consumption is widely seen as crucial for sustainable growth.

  • The analysis suggests that despite consensus on the need for stronger consumer demand, Beijing faces challenges in shifting from an investment-driven economy due to long-standing transfers that benefit manufacturing, infrastructure, and local governments at the expense of households.
Liberal
Commentary
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
A Cosmopolitan Case against World Government
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

A Cosmopolitan Case against World Government

Summary
  • Ilya Somin at Cato Institute argues that supporting globalization and opposing world government are not contradictory positions because a world government could worsen voter ignorance, hinder foot voting, and potentially spiral into catastrophic authoritarianism.
  • The article asserts that world government is unnecessary for solving global issues and could suppress beneficial diversity and competition between nations. Instead, voluntary cooperation among major powers can address international challenges effectively.
Libertarian
Report
·
U.S. Government & Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Project 2025 Compels Local Prosecutors To Enforce Extreme Right-Wing Laws
Center for American Progress
·
Nov 18, 2023

Project 2025 Compels Local Prosecutors To Enforce Extreme Right-Wing Laws

Summary
  • Lindsey McLendon at Center for American Progress argues that Project 2025 aims to dismantle the U.S. system of checks and balances, granting politicians, judges, and corporations increased control over Americans' lives by enforcing extreme right-wing policies through the U.S. Department of Justice.
  • The Center for American Progress asserts that Project 2025 would pressure local district attorneys to enforce severe abortion bans and other restrictive laws, exacerbating the maternal health crisis and reducing access to essential reproductive healthcare, particularly in states with already high maternal mortality rates.
Progressive
Article
·
U.S. Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump chose Vance to reinforce his message
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump chose Vance to reinforce his message

Summary
  • Elaine Kamarck at Brookings writes that in selecting Senator J.D. Vance as his running mate, Donald Trump aimed to solidify his hard-right agenda, emphasizing Vance's alignment with Trump's core messages and MAGA base.
  • The article examines how Trump's choice of Vance follows the "reinforcing model" of vice-presidential selection, where the VP candidate strengthens the presidential candidate's message and governance, rather than providing a traditional ideological or geographic balance.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.