Brookings
·
Published
August 5, 2024
Share this article

Summary

  • Comfort Oshagbemi and David Wessel at Brookings examine why the U.S. spends substantially more on transportation infrastructure compared to other countries, highlighting limited state DOT capacity and over-reliance on consultants as key cost-drivers.
  • The authors argue that limited competition and insufficient bidder outreach in the market for government construction contracts contribute to higher infrastructure costs in the U.S., and increasing bidder outreach and improving project planning can significantly reduce these costs.

Overview:

This article was written by Comfort Oshagbemi and David Wessel at Brookings.

  • The high cost of infrastructure in the U.S. is partly due to the limited capacity of state departments of transportation (DOTs) and the over-reliance on consultants.
  • Limited competition in the market for government construction contracts also drives up costs.

Key Quotes:

  • “A one standard deviation increase in state capacity (measured by state DOT employment per capita) is correlated with 16% lower costs.”
  • “An additional bidder on a project was associated with 8.3% lower costs, approximately $460,000 for the average project.”

What They Discuss:

  • U.S. infrastructure costs three times as much on a per-mile basis compared to other upper- and middle-income countries.
  • State DOTs report severe understaffing and an over-reliance on consultants, leading to higher costs; a one standard deviation increase in consultant use is associated with 20% higher costs per lane-mile.
  • A lack of competition in the bidding process for government construction contracts further increases costs; enhancing bidder outreach can reduce costs by 17.6%.
  • The performance of individual engineers significantly impacts project costs; replacing a high-cost engineer with a median-cost engineer can reduce costs by 5.3% per mile.
  • Better planning and providing more bid details are associated with lower costs, while frequent change orders due to poor planning lead to higher expenditures.

What They Recommend:

  • Increase the staffing capacity of state DOTs to reduce reliance on costly consultants.
  • Enhance outreach efforts to potential bidders to increase competition and lower costs.
  • Focus on better planning and providing detailed project information to minimize costly change orders.
  • Invest in training and capacity-building for state engineers to ensure more consistent and efficient project management.

Key Takeaways:

  • High U.S. infrastructure costs can be mitigated by strengthening state DOT capacities and encouraging competitive bidding.
  • Proper planning and detailed bidding information can significantly reduce project costs.
  • Addressing staffing and competitive challenges can lead to substantial cost savings on infrastructure projects.

This is a brief overview of the article by Comfort Oshagbemi and David Wessel at Brookings. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
With AI, we need both competition and safety
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

With AI, we need both competition and safety

Summary
  • Tom Wheeler and Blair Levin at Brookings argue that the FTC and DOJ should investigate AI collaborations and transactions for antitrust concerns while simultaneously encouraging AI safety standards through industry cooperation.
  • They propose a model that balances competition and AI safety, advocating supervised processes, market incentives, and regulatory oversight to ensure AI companies collaborate on safety without undermining competitive markets.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
Artificial Intelligence
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
North Carolina’s emergence as a swing state could help Biden win in November
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

North Carolina’s emergence as a swing state could help Biden win in November

Summary
  • Elaine Kamarck and Deirdre Keenan at Brookings argue that North Carolina has become a key swing state due to significant population growth and shifting demographics, particularly in the Raleigh-Durham-Cary area, which is attracting college-educated professionals and new residents from heavily Democratic states, indicating a potential Democratic advantage in upcoming elections.
  • The analysis asserts that efforts by the North Carolina Democratic Party, led by Anderson Clayton, to mobilize young voters, re-engage rural communities, and contest every legislative race could generate significant momentum and potentially tilt the state toward a Democratic victory in the 2024 presidential election.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Russia Is a Strategic Spoiler in the Indo-Pacific
RAND Corporation
·
Nov 18, 2023

Russia Is a Strategic Spoiler in the Indo-Pacific

Summary
  • Derek Grossman at RAND Corporation writes that Russia continues to play a significant role in the Indo-Pacific, forging strategic partnerships with China, North Korea, and Vietnam to counter U.S. influence and distract from its invasion of Ukraine.
  • The article asserts that while Russia's influence lags behind China and the U.S., it remains capable of promoting anti-Western interests and destabilizing the regional order, drawing nations toward nonalignment rather than a Cold War–style bloc standoff.
Center
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump v. US: With Great Power Comes Great Immunity
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump v. US: With Great Power Comes Great Immunity

Summary
  • Gene Healy at Cato Institute argues that Chief Justice John Roberts' ruling in Trump v. United States introduces broad presidential immunities, raising concerns about unchecked executive power and "legislating from the bench."
  • The article asserts that these new immunities could pave the way for presidential recklessness, with critics like Healy and Justice Sonia Sotomayor highlighting the lack of constitutional basis and potential abuse of power by future presidents.
Libertarian
Commentary
·
U.S. Government & Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Biden’s debate performance threatens his ability to win
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Biden’s debate performance threatens his ability to win

Summary
  • William A. Galston at Brookings assesses the impact of first presidential debates since 1976, noting their significant but delayed effect on voter preferences, often detracting from the incumbent or their party.
  • Recent debates show a 2.8 percentage point average voter shift, critical in tightly contested elections. Following the Biden-Trump debate, Biden's standing dropped 2 points, heightening the challenge of securing necessary electoral votes.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.