American Enterprise Institute
·
Published
January 17, 2024

Claudine Gay Is Just the Start

Conservative
Blog
·
Education
Share this article

Summary

  • AEI scholar Samuel J. Abrams argues that while Gay's resignation is a step forward, it is insufficient in addressing the broader issues within Harvard and other collegiate institutions regarding DEI policies.
  • Abrams criticizes Harvard's DEI bureaucracy, accusing it of promoting hatred toward Jews and suppressing free speech.

Overview:

The article from the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) by Samuel J. Abrams discusses the resignation of Claudine Gay from the Harvard presidency, criticizing the institution's approach to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and its impact on academic standards and freedom of speech. The article argues that while Gay's resignation is a step forward, it is insufficient in addressing the broader issues within Harvard and other collegiate institutions regarding DEI policies.

Key Points:

  1. Claudine Gay's resignation is seen as a response to her failure to condemn antisemitism and meet academic standards, but the article argues that it is merely symbolic and does not address the root problems at Harvard.
  2. The article criticizes Harvard's DEI bureaucracy, accusing it of promoting hatred toward Jews and suppressing free speech.
  3. It suggests that DEI policies are deeply embedded in many schools and are divisive, citing examples from Johns Hopkins University.
  4. The article acknowledges some progress against DEI policies in states like Utah but insists that more needs to be done to dismantle these offices in educational institutions.
  5. The author expresses concern that Harvard's current climate remains antithetical to its mission of finding and promoting truth, even after Gay's departure.

What They Discuss:

  • Claudine Gay faced criticism for her handling of issues related to antisemitism and academic standards during her tenure at Harvard.
  • The article views DEI initiatives as harmful to academic freedom and standards, promoting a divisive and reductive approach to identity and privilege.

What They Recommend:

  • The article calls for the dismantling of DEI offices in colleges and universities, arguing that they promote racist and anti-inclusive ideas.
  • It suggests that institutions should focus on their core missions of truth and exceptional scholarship, free from the influence of DEI bureaucracy.

Critique:

  • The article presents a critical view of DEI initiatives, suggesting that they have a negative impact on academic standards and freedom of speech.
  • It advocates for a return to traditional academic values and standards, free from what it perceives as the ideological influence of DEI policies.

This is a brief overview of Samuel J. Abrams' article from the American Enterprise Institute on Claudine Gay's resignation and the broader implications for DEI policies in higher education. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Putting Public Colleges on a Path to Privatization
American Enterprise Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Putting Public Colleges on a Path to Privatization

Summary
  • Adam Kissel at American Enterprise Institute argues that public universities suffer from a culture of timidity in discussing conservative ideas and that privatizing these institutions could introduce market discipline, potentially saving states billions in subsidies.
  • The article advocates for states to wait until interest rates drop below 4 percent before attempting to privatize universities through an endowment/bond plan, suggesting this transition will lead to institutions better aligned with market needs and free from bureaucratic constraints.
Conservative
Commentary
·
Education
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
With AI, we need both competition and safety
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

With AI, we need both competition and safety

Summary
  • Tom Wheeler and Blair Levin at Brookings argue that the FTC and DOJ should investigate AI collaborations and transactions for antitrust concerns while simultaneously encouraging AI safety standards through industry cooperation.
  • They propose a model that balances competition and AI safety, advocating supervised processes, market incentives, and regulatory oversight to ensure AI companies collaborate on safety without undermining competitive markets.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
Artificial Intelligence
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
North Carolina’s emergence as a swing state could help Biden win in November
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

North Carolina’s emergence as a swing state could help Biden win in November

Summary
  • Elaine Kamarck and Deirdre Keenan at Brookings argue that North Carolina has become a key swing state due to significant population growth and shifting demographics, particularly in the Raleigh-Durham-Cary area, which is attracting college-educated professionals and new residents from heavily Democratic states, indicating a potential Democratic advantage in upcoming elections.
  • The analysis asserts that efforts by the North Carolina Democratic Party, led by Anderson Clayton, to mobilize young voters, re-engage rural communities, and contest every legislative race could generate significant momentum and potentially tilt the state toward a Democratic victory in the 2024 presidential election.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Russia Is a Strategic Spoiler in the Indo-Pacific
RAND Corporation
·
Nov 18, 2023

Russia Is a Strategic Spoiler in the Indo-Pacific

Summary
  • Derek Grossman at RAND Corporation writes that Russia continues to play a significant role in the Indo-Pacific, forging strategic partnerships with China, North Korea, and Vietnam to counter U.S. influence and distract from its invasion of Ukraine.
  • The article asserts that while Russia's influence lags behind China and the U.S., it remains capable of promoting anti-Western interests and destabilizing the regional order, drawing nations toward nonalignment rather than a Cold War–style bloc standoff.
Center
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump v. US: With Great Power Comes Great Immunity
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump v. US: With Great Power Comes Great Immunity

Summary
  • Gene Healy at Cato Institute argues that Chief Justice John Roberts' ruling in Trump v. United States introduces broad presidential immunities, raising concerns about unchecked executive power and "legislating from the bench."
  • The article asserts that these new immunities could pave the way for presidential recklessness, with critics like Healy and Justice Sonia Sotomayor highlighting the lack of constitutional basis and potential abuse of power by future presidents.
Libertarian
Commentary
·
U.S. Government & Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.