Center for American Progress
·
Published
August 3, 2020

The Need for Supreme Court Term Limits

Progressive
Report
·
U.S. Government & Politics
Share this article

Summary

  • Maggie Jo Buchanan points out that the average tenure of Supreme Court justices has significantly increased, leading to a lack of regularity in vacancies and a more politically charged confirmation process.
  • Implementing an 18-year nonrenewable term limit for Supreme Court justices could help better reflect the broader public and reduce the politicization of the court.

Overview:

This article, written by Maggie Jo Buchanan, addresses the need for implementing term limits for U.S. Supreme Court Justices to reflect modern societal changes.

  • Buchanan points out that the average tenure of Supreme Court justices has significantly increased, leading to a lack of regularity in vacancies and a more politically charged confirmation process.
  • The article suggests that term limits could help the Supreme Court better reflect the broader public and reduce the politicization of the court.​

Key Quotes:

  1. "The average justice’s term is now longer than it has been at any other point in U.S. history."
  2. "Regular appointments, however, would hopefully make the confirmation process less political."

What They Discuss:

  •  The average age of Supreme Court justices has remained static, but their terms have lengthened due to increased life expectancy.
  • Longer terms have led to justices having more power and influence over American life, more so than other branches of government.
  • The political nature of the confirmation process has intensified, with Senate leaders and presidents incentivized to secure ideologically aligned justices.
  • Proposals for term limits, such as an 18-year nonrenewable limit, are gaining momentum and support from various legal academics and justices.
  • Term limits could ensure more regular turnover, making the court more reflective of the public and less influenced by political agendas.

What They Recommend:

  • Implement an 18-year nonrenewable term limit for Supreme Court justices.
  • Ensure a more regular appointment process to reflect the broader public and reduce political tensions.
  • Allow justices to continue working in a senior status after their term ends, maintaining their contributions to the judiciary.
  • Consider statutory limits for term limits, either retrospectively or prospectively.

Key Takeaways:

  • The article emphasizes the need for Supreme Court term limits to address the challenges posed by longer tenures and increased politicization.
  • It argues that term limits would bring a healthier turnover and alignment with public sentiment, enhancing the court's legitimacy.
  • The recommendations aim to balance the need for experienced justices with the benefits of regular new appointments.​

This is a brief overview of Maggie Jo Buchanan's work from the Center for American Progress. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Putting Public Colleges on a Path to Privatization
American Enterprise Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Putting Public Colleges on a Path to Privatization

Summary
  • Adam Kissel at American Enterprise Institute argues that public universities suffer from a culture of timidity in discussing conservative ideas and that privatizing these institutions could introduce market discipline, potentially saving states billions in subsidies.
  • The article advocates for states to wait until interest rates drop below 4 percent before attempting to privatize universities through an endowment/bond plan, suggesting this transition will lead to institutions better aligned with market needs and free from bureaucratic constraints.
Conservative
Commentary
·
Education
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
With AI, we need both competition and safety
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

With AI, we need both competition and safety

Summary
  • Tom Wheeler and Blair Levin at Brookings argue that the FTC and DOJ should investigate AI collaborations and transactions for antitrust concerns while simultaneously encouraging AI safety standards through industry cooperation.
  • They propose a model that balances competition and AI safety, advocating supervised processes, market incentives, and regulatory oversight to ensure AI companies collaborate on safety without undermining competitive markets.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
Artificial Intelligence
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
North Carolina’s emergence as a swing state could help Biden win in November
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

North Carolina’s emergence as a swing state could help Biden win in November

Summary
  • Elaine Kamarck and Deirdre Keenan at Brookings argue that North Carolina has become a key swing state due to significant population growth and shifting demographics, particularly in the Raleigh-Durham-Cary area, which is attracting college-educated professionals and new residents from heavily Democratic states, indicating a potential Democratic advantage in upcoming elections.
  • The analysis asserts that efforts by the North Carolina Democratic Party, led by Anderson Clayton, to mobilize young voters, re-engage rural communities, and contest every legislative race could generate significant momentum and potentially tilt the state toward a Democratic victory in the 2024 presidential election.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Russia Is a Strategic Spoiler in the Indo-Pacific
RAND Corporation
·
Nov 18, 2023

Russia Is a Strategic Spoiler in the Indo-Pacific

Summary
  • Derek Grossman at RAND Corporation writes that Russia continues to play a significant role in the Indo-Pacific, forging strategic partnerships with China, North Korea, and Vietnam to counter U.S. influence and distract from its invasion of Ukraine.
  • The article asserts that while Russia's influence lags behind China and the U.S., it remains capable of promoting anti-Western interests and destabilizing the regional order, drawing nations toward nonalignment rather than a Cold War–style bloc standoff.
Center
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump v. US: With Great Power Comes Great Immunity
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump v. US: With Great Power Comes Great Immunity

Summary
  • Gene Healy at Cato Institute argues that Chief Justice John Roberts' ruling in Trump v. United States introduces broad presidential immunities, raising concerns about unchecked executive power and "legislating from the bench."
  • The article asserts that these new immunities could pave the way for presidential recklessness, with critics like Healy and Justice Sonia Sotomayor highlighting the lack of constitutional basis and potential abuse of power by future presidents.
Libertarian
Commentary
·
U.S. Government & Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.